Skip to Content

The Year in U.S. Equity Funds: Growth Was King in 2017

Tech-heavy large-growth funds fared best while small-value funds posted smaller gains.

U.S. stocks continued their relentless march upward in 2017, extending one of the longest bull markets in history. (Only the 1990s bull market lasted longer.) The year began with a lot of market optimism due to the business-friendly agenda of the incoming Donald Trump administration, and even though dysfunction in Washington ended up tempering many of those expectations, the economy continued to hum along and corporate earnings were generally solid. The S&P 500 gained 22% for the year to date through December 23, and the tech-heavy NASDAQ Composite Index returned 31%.

In general, growth funds performed better than value funds in 2017, and large-caps outpaced small-caps. Among the nine Morningstar Style Box categories, large-growth funds posted the highest average gains (28%), and small-value funds had the lowest (9%). This pattern was driven by the strong stock performance of big tech names such as

To investors with a long memory, all this may sound uncomfortably similar to the peak of the late-1990s bull market, when big tech stocks were red-hot and anything value-oriented was shunned. More than one person has compared the recent speculative frenzy in bitcoin to the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s, when Internet stocks with shaky to nonexistent business models were bid up to stratospheric valuations before crashing hard. On the other hand, some commentators have argued that this bull market is more substantial than the 1999 one, and that stocks aren't nearly as expensive. (For example, see here and here.)

Although just about everybody made money in 2017, some domestic stock funds performed much better than others. Here are some of the most prominent individual winners and losers of the past year, illustrating key trends.

Winners

Two other funds that benefited from 2017 market trends were

While the above funds took full advantage of a market favorable to their investing styles in 2017, other funds excelled despite facing major headwinds. Two good examples are the mid-cap value

Losers

The worst 2017 return of any U.S. stock fund covered by Morningstar Analysts belongs to

Fairholme and FPA Capital both have Neutral ratings due to the protracted nature of their recent struggles, but other funds performed poorly in 2017 for reasons that are more specific to this year. Silver-rated

More in Funds

About the Author

David Kathman

Senior Analyst, Equity Strategies, Manager Research
More from Author

David Kathman, CFA, Ph.D., is a senior manager research analyst for Morningstar Research Services LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Morningstar, Inc. He focuses on a variety of domestic large-, mid-, and small-cap equity strategies and is the team's lead analyst for the Cohen & Steers, Amana, Eventide, Ave Maria, Amana, DF Dent, and Jackson Square fund families. He is also the team's specialist in real estate and sector funds and is an expert in socially responsible and faith-based funds. He joined Morningstar in 1998 as an equity analyst.

Kathman holds a bachelor's and master's degrees in linguistics from Michigan State University and a doctorate in linguistics from the University of Chicago. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation.

Sponsor Center