This strategy holds securities with low exposure to ESG risk relative to those of its peers in the Morningstar Natural Resources Sector Equity category, earning it the highest Morningstar Sustainability Rating of 5 globes. ESG risk measures the degree to which material environmental, social, and governance issues, such as climate change, biodiversity, human capital, as well as bribery and corruption, could affect valuations. ESG risk differs from impact, which is about driving positive environmental and social outcomes for society’s benefit.
Based on its latest prospectus, sustainability or ESG factors are a focus in the investment process of KBI Global Investors Aquarius Fund. Funds with ESG-focused mandates are more likely to deliver positive sustainability outcomes. KBI Global Investors Aquarius Fund has an asset-weighted Carbon Risk Score of 9.6, indicating that its companies have low exposure to carbon-related risks. These are risks associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy such as increased regulation, changing consumer preferences, technological advancements, and stranded assets. The fund's current involvement in fossil fuels rests at 9.3%, which compares favorably with 29.4% for its average category peer. Companies are considered involved in fossil fuels if they derive some revenue from thermal coal, oil, and gas. Its 11.3% involvement in carbon solutions is higher than the 4.7% average involvement of its peers in the Natural Resources category. Carbon solutions include products and services related to renewable energy, energy efficiency, green buildings, green transportation, and so on.
The fund has no exposure to high or severe controversies. Controversies are incidents that have a negative impact on stakeholders or the environment, which create some degree of financial risk for the company. Examples of types of controversies include bribery and corruption scandals, workplace discrimination and environmental incidents. Severe and high controversies can have significant financial repercussions, ranging from legal penalties to consumer boycotts. Such controversies can also damage the reputation of both companies themselves and their shareholders.