Skip to Content

Amazon and Apple are the most valuable brands in the world — but these Chinese companies are catching up

By Jennifer Adams

These are the top 100 most valuable global brands for 2021, according to a company that analyzes brand equity

Amazon and Apple are the world's most valuable brands, but watch out -- these Chinese e-commerce leaders are slowly but surely rising in the ranks.

Tech giants Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOGL) and Microsoft (MSFT) lead this year's list (link) of Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands by Kantar BrandZ, a company that analyzes brand equity, but Chinese social media and video games company Tencent is close behind in fifth place.

Kantar BrandZ uses its own formula (link) to come up with a company's value. It calls it "a holistic portrait of brand equity: one that incorporates how the market values a company's brand assets -- and how ordinary people do."

While Amazon's value increased 64% this year to reach $684 billion, Tencent grew 60% to hit $240 billion. Tesla (TSLA) also skyrocketed a whopping 275% to notch $43 billion, landing at 47th place on the list.

More than a dozen other Chinese brands also made the list, including a few that more than doubled in value in the past year: alcohol maker Moutai was in 11th place with $109 billion, internet company Meituan was in 34th place with $52 billion, and farm-produce-selling platform Pinduoduo (PDD) in 81st place with $22 billion.

TikTok , which placed 45th, was valued at $44 billion.

"Chinese brands are steadily and slowly progressing," Graham Staplehurst, global strategy director at Kantar BrandZ, told Reuters (link). "[They] have made significant headway as more companies leverage their own technological developments and demonstrate their abilities to align with the major trends shaping China and the global market."

Most European brands didn't follow the same growth trend, however. These brands made up only eight percent of the top 100, compared with 20% a decade ago. France's luxury fashion label Louis Vuitton was the most valuable European brand, placing 21st on the list. German software company SAP was 26th, followed by the UK telecommunications company Vodafone at 60th.

American brands made up the majority of the most valuable companies, comprising 74% of the list. Thirteen brands made the list for the first time, including Zoom (ZM) in 52nd place with $37 billion and Spotify (SPOT) in 99th place with $19 billion.

All 100 listed brands were valued at a combined $7.1 trillion, an increase from last year's $5 trillion.

-Jennifer Adams; 415-439-6400;


(END) Dow Jones Newswires

06-21-21 1740ET

Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.