Why Washington Is So Obsessed With China's Huawei
By Stu Woo
In intervening this week in a major technology takeover battle, the American government is acting on concerns over a Chinese company with little visibility in the U.S.: Huawei Technologies Co.
The world's top cellular-equipment maker and a leading smartphone brand, Huawei in the past three months has been the subject of a series of extraordinary interventions, or attempted interventions, by the Trump administration and Congress across the telecommunications industry.
The latest was Washington's move this week to intervene in Singapore-based Broadcom Ltd.'s attempted hostile takeover of U.S.-based Qualcomm Inc. It ordered Qualcomm to delay a shareholder vote that Broadcom hoped would elevate directors friendly to its $117 billion bid.
In a letter explaining its interference, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., a panel that reviews foreign takeovers for national-security concerns, cited its worry that China, specifically Huawei, could gain the upper hand in the development of 5G.
Translation: Removing an able U.S. competitor to Huawei risks strengthening the Chinese company at the expense of the American wireless industry.
5G is the next-generation mobile-network technology that the industry is preparing to roll out around the world. American officials and some Western telecom companies worry that if China gains widespread 5G before the U.S. does, it could have a head start in technologies that the new networks' speed and capacity are expected to kick-start, like self-driving cars.
Some Washington policy makers and industry executives have suggested a deeper worry that, with Huawei's help, China could displace Silicon Valley as the world's innovation center and lure top engineers there. Another concern: If Huawei extends its lead in the telecom-equipment industry, these officials believe, American wireless carriers might have no choice but to use Huawei gear in the future.
Major American wireless carriers, such as AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc., have said they are initially focusing 5G coverage in a few cities. "What I see in the U.S. is wireless carriers choosing particular geographic markets for 5G," said Gartner Inc. analyst Ian Keene. "The way the Chinese are going to approach it, it's going to be blanketed."
The extent to which the U.S. government shares that fear was laid bare in unusual clarity in the CFIUS letter. The committee said it would probe whether a Broadcom-Qualcomm tie-up would "leave an opening for China to expand its influence on the 5G standard setting process." It cited specifically Huawei's 5G "engagement."
Not everyone shares U.S. worries about Huawei. U.K.-based Vodafone Group PLC, the world's No. 2 wireless carrier by subscribers, said it worked "very well" with Huawei's equipment.
"They are a very innovative company. They are very open. We never found anything less than normal in the Huawei equipment and software," Vodafone Chief Executive Vittorio Colao said at a wireless-industry conference last week. "It's not like the Cisco router" -- telecom equipment made by one of Huawei's American rivals -- "is very different. It's made in China."
In the past decade, U.S. telecom companies such as Lucent and Motorola merged into foreign hands, leaving Qualcomm as one of the few American powerhouses in the industry. Huawei buys chips from and pays patent royalties to Qualcomm, and on Tuesday the two sides were close to an agreement to settle a patent-royalty dispute, according to people familiar with the matter. The two also fiercely compete for cellular patents. In that $14 billion a-year-industry, Qualcomm dominates. Both are leaders in the international consortium currently setting standards for 5G.
"When you look at the whole package -- the standards innovations, the hardware innovation, the impact on the industry from a technology perspective -- then yes, Qualcomm is the leader in 5G," said Bob DiFazio, vice president at wireless-technology developer InterDigital.
Concern over Huawei isn't new. Congress effectively barred major carriers from using the company, after a 2012 report concluded Beijing could force Huawei to use knowledge of how its own equipment is designed to spy or disable telecom networks.
A Huawei spokesman said the company is employee-owned, and that no government has ever asked it to spy on or sabotage another country. The spokesman said the company was aware of U.S. government activities seemingly aimed at inhibiting its business and that its poses no greater risk than other telecommunications-equipment companies, given they share a global supply chain.
Late last year, congressional pressure mounted on AT&T to drop plans to sell Huawei smartphones in the U.S. In a surprise reversal, the company did just that in January; it declined to cite a reason.
Then, a National Security Council official cited Huawei's telecom-equipment-industry dominance in a proposal to build a government-backed nationwide, 5G wireless network. After the proposal became public in January, drawing widespread criticism from other government officials and the wireless industry, a Trump administration spokeswoman said it was only an early stage idea.
And in December, President Donald Trump signed a defense-spending bill that will ban equipment from Huawei and China's ZTE Corp. from the Defense Department's nuclear-weapon infrastructure. Lawmakers in the House and Senate have also introduced separate bills to bar the U.S. government and its contractors from using Huawei and ZTE equipment.
Write to Stu Woo at Stu.Woo@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
March 06, 2018 17:10 ET (22:10 GMT)Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.