Skip to Content
Global News Select

Biden's Capital-Gains Tax Plan Would Upend Estate Planning by the Wealthy

By Richard Rubin and Rachel Louise Ensign 

President Biden's American Families Plan would raise capital-gains taxes and end a rule that has been a cornerstone of estate planning for generations of wealthy Americans.

The change -- increasing the top capital-gains rate to 43.4% from 23.8% and taxing assets as if sold when someone dies -- would upend the tax strategies of the very richest households. Mr. Biden's plan would also claw back some benefits Congress gave to slightly less wealthy multimillionaires who have been spared from the estate tax but now could face capital-gains taxes at death.

Today, people who own assets that have boomed in value -- Apple Inc. stock, the family beach house, a three-generation manufacturing company -- don't pay capital-gains taxes unless they sell. Under the Biden proposal, those unrealized gains would trigger taxes upon the owner's death, minus a $1 million per-person exemption.

More than two-thirds of all U.S. families have some unrealized capital gains, according to the Federal Reserve, but most would be covered by the $1 million exemption. For families in the top 10%, with a median net worth of $2.6 million, median unrealized gains are $519,000.

The plan likely will change as it moves through Congress, and some Senate Democrats are already balking. Rep. Cindy Axne (D., Iowa) is concerned about the impact on family-owned farms and is working with other lawmakers from rural areas to seek an exemption for them. Republicans say tax increases would kill jobs and slow the economic recovery.

Meanwhile, wealthy people and their advisers are rethinking strategies and investments. Financial adviser Ken Van Leeuwen says he has received more fearful calls from clients about the tax-law changes in the past week than ever. Even those who voted for Mr. Biden are worried. "Are we becoming socialists?" he said one asked him.

Mr. Van Leeuwen's Princeton, N.J.-based firm caters to people with net worth between $5 million and $25 million. Many are concerned their children will pay taxes on inherited second homes.

The Biden proposal would blow up several longstanding tax concepts: That capital gains deserve a lower tax rate than wages and that people can inherit old assets without paying capital-gains taxes. Democrats and their allies say those features of the tax system, however, are unfairly tilted to the very wealthy.

"It's one of the biggest, most inefficient and hardest-to-justify tax breaks that exists in the code," said Chye-Ching Huang, executive director of New York University's Tax Law Center. "There's just a tiny, tiny sliver of people that have that kind of gain. It's just so unusual."

Under the current tax system, the top capital-gains tax rate is 23.8%, compared with 40.8% on wages, with state taxes on top of both. Congress created the lower rate as an incentive to invest and a way to prevent the tax code from discouraging asset sales. It is also a rough adjustment for inflation.

Heirs have to pay such taxes only when they sell and only on the gain since the prior owner's death. The provision is known as the tax-free step-up in basis and has been part of the tax code since the Revenue Act of 1921. It saves taxpayers more than $40 billion a year, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation; the Biden proposal would take back some of that.

The step-up in basis is separate from the estate tax, which is based on net worth at death, not just appreciated gains. It has an $11.7 million per-person exemption. Opponents of Mr. Biden's plan warn of steep combined rates on people hit by both taxes.

"If we lose the step-up in basis, that turns the estate planning world upside down," said Alvina Lo, a tax attorney and chief wealth strategist at M & T Bank Corp. unit Wilmington Trust.

The problem, Democrats say, is that significant amounts of income escape the income tax entirely, because people can buy assets, borrow against them for living expenses and die without paying income taxes on the gain. For very wealthy investors or billionaire founders of companies who take small salaries as their stock grows, it can make the income tax effectively optional.

"If you're elderly and own highly appreciated assets, God forbid you should sell them while you're alive," said Lawrence Zelenak, a Duke University law professor.

Under the Biden plan, except for charitable bequests, death is treated like a sale, with a $1 million per-person exemption. He would keep existing exclusions for gain on a principal residence of $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for married couples.

Now, someone who paid $2 million for a business and dies when it is worth $12 million would pay no capital-gains taxes. And if that is his only asset, he would owe no estate taxes. Under the Biden plan, he would pay taxes on $9 million -- the $10 million gain minus the $1 million exemption -- with a top marginal tax rate of 43.4%. Assets held in retirement accounts generally aren't affected.

The capital-gains rate change and taxation at death work together. Without the change to the basis rules, the 43.4% tax rate would lose money for the government because it would encourage people to hold assets that they would otherwise sell.

The Biden proposal says it will have unspecified "protections" so family-owned businesses and farms won't owe taxes if heirs continue to run the business.

Manufacturers and farmers, who tend to be more asset-rich and cash-poor, are watching closely for those details, concerned they might have to sell illiquid businesses to pay the taxes.

Courtney Silver, president of Ketchie Inc., a family-owned, 25-employee machine shop in Concord, N.C. that started in 1947, said she was concerned about the potential impact.

"I really can't imagine being hit with that decision of that potential tax implication," said Ms. Silver, 40 years old, who took over the business when her husband, Bobby Ketchie, died in 2014. "That to me is really hard to wrap my head around."

It could be challenging for asset owners to figure out their tax basis, which is what they paid for the property and invested in it. That complexity is part of what doomed a similar proposal in the late 1970s, which Congress passed, then delayed, then repealed.

Others might sell long-held assets to pay the taxes.

Vera Dunn lives in Beverly Hills, Calif., with her 102-year-old mother in a house bought for about $100,000 in 1965. Ms. Dunn estimates the house would be worth $10 million to a buyer who would tear it down.

She said she has borrowed $4 million against the house to pay for her mother's care and is already concerned about California tax changes on inherited property. If her mother lives past the effective date of the Biden plan, Ms. Dunn said, it would be impossible to pay the taxes and keep the house.

"It happens to be a beautiful house in a beautiful location. It happens to be all I have," she said. "Nobody's going to cry over my situation. I'm not passing a handkerchief around, but everyone I think can relate to [it.] How do you feel if you can't keep the family home and if businesses are not paying taxes that are worth billions of dollars?"

Wealthy Americans with over $100 million in assets are already turning to a range of techniques to minimize the hit from steeper taxes on their wealth, and many have already shifted further into tax-advantaged assets, said Mike Kosnitzky, co-head of the private wealth practice at law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.

The Biden proposal would make it be tougher for the merely wealthy who use less sophisticated tax-planning vehicles to avoid a hit, Mr. Kosnitzky said.

Jeremiah Barlow, head of family wealth services at Mercer Advisors Inc., says his clients, who typically have a net worth between $5 million and $15 million, are giving assets to loved ones before they die to take advantage of the estate-and-gift tax exemption.

Mr. Barlow is telling them they should be ready to accelerate asset sales if the proposed changes take effect and to monitor the effective date set by Congress. A family may want to sell its business before the end of the year or sell stock that has appreciated in value if they already planned to sell those assets in the next few years regardless of tax-law changes.

Donating appreciated assets to charity could become an increasingly appealing way of minimizing a tax bite, said Michael Nathanson, chief executive of Boston financial advisory firm The Colony Group. Such donations can bypass capital-gains taxes, and the deductions from them can be used against other income.

One strategy to contend with the proposed tax-policy change tax is to simply wait it out.

Republicans' opposition could make the tax change fragile. If the plan were permanent, asset owners would face a roughly tax-neutral choice -- pay taxes on a sale now or at death later. But given the political landscape, the choice may be to sell now or hang on until a future Congress changes the rules.

Investors' expectations are crucial for the policy change to work as intended, said Jason Furman, who was a top adviser to former President Barack Obama.

"If you think that it's going to be repealed by the next Republican administration and the repeal is going to stand, then you might still not realize your gains," he said. "It will take some time to survive one regime change, to become an expected part of the law."

Write to Richard Rubin at richard.rubin@wsj.com and Rachel Louise Ensign at rachel.ensign@wsj.com

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 29, 2021 13:22 ET (17:22 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.