Skip to Content
Global News Select

Samsung Profit Rises 26% on Continued Pandemic-Driven Demand

By Elizabeth Koh 

SEOUL -- Samsung Electronics Co. reported a 26% boost in its fourth-quarter net profit Thursday, as the world's largest maker of smartphones and memory chips continues to ride sustained demand for its products amid the coronavirus pandemic.

But the South Korean tech giant faces extra challenges as it enters a new year. Beyond the pandemic, the company is contending with its de facto leader Lee Jae-yong being back behind bars. And its rivals, for handsets and semiconductors, are consolidating and getting larger.

Samsung posted 6.61 trillion South Korean won, or nearly $6 billion, in net profit for the quarter ended Dec. 31, over last year's 5.23 trillion won. Revenue rose to 61.55 trillion won from the prior year's 59.88 trillion won.

Analysts had forecast about 6.74 trillion won in net profit and 61.21 trillion won in revenue, according to estimates from S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Like other technology companies, Samsung has fared well in the pandemic on the strength of demand for most consumer electronics, though economic pressures squeezed smartphone sales in the first half of last year. The company is closely watched in the technology world, as a major manufacturer of appliances and computing devices as well as a critical supplier to other electronics firms.

The company warned of weaker earnings in the opening quarter of 2021, though it signaled it expected growth in the first half of the new year.

In handsets, Samsung has recovered from most of the dent created by pandemic-fueled store closures early last year. Just two weeks ago, the company launched its newest flagship phone, the Galaxy S21, at a marked discount from previous years, trying to capture market share from Huawei Technologies Co. while the Chinese firm is cut off from its chip supply by U.S. sanctions.

But Samsung's release, which moves up the sales window for the company's newest offerings by more than a month, is the most aggressive the company has been in recent years and signals the pressure the pandemic continues to put on smartphone recovery, said Wayne Lam, a senior director of research at CCS Insight, a market researcher.

"You can look back in history -- they've only been adding cost and adding to the overall phone price," Mr. Lam said. "Now they're giving themselves a haircut."

The smartphone market could also shift more to benefit Samsung -- or other rivals -- if LG Electronics Co. sells off its smartphone division, which has been bleeding money for nearly six years. LG, based in Seoul, remains a main competitor for the U.S. market, though it has lost ground against Samsung and Apple Inc. This month, LG's chief executive told employees it was "leaving all possibilities open" for the future of the unit.

Samsung's memory division saw prices fall in the fourth quarter, after demand from servers and cloud computing centers began to taper and a stronger Korean won dinged earnings. But memory prices are likely to rise again in the first half of 2021, industry analysts said, particularly amid a global chip shortage and rising demand from sectors like the automotive industry.

Samsung is also considering longer-term investments to shore up its chip manufacturing, as competitors have consolidated in recent months. It has been scouting locations in Arizona, Texas or New York, where it might invest as much as $17 billion, The Wall Street Journal reported last week.

But major moves at Samsung are in new turmoil now that Mr. Lee, officially Samsung's vice chairman, is back in prison after a retrial on charges of bribing South Korea's former president. Mr. Lee and his lawyers declined to appeal the ruling Monday, which sentenced him to an additional year and a half in prison after time previously served.

In an internal Tuesday message posted by Samsung's three CEOs, Mr. Lee apologized for "causing worry" and asked employees to continue working "to make investments, create jobs and fulfill [Samsung's] social responsibilities."

Write to Elizabeth Koh at


(END) Dow Jones Newswires

January 27, 2021 20:16 ET (01:16 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.