Skip to Content

SPDR® DoubleLine® Emerg Mkts Fxd Inc ETF EMTL Sustainability

| Medalist Rating as of | See State Street Investment Hub

Sustainability Analysis

Author Image

Sustainability Summary

SPDR ® DoubleLine ® Emerg Mkts Fxd Inc ETF may not appeal to sustainability-conscious investors.

The ESG risk of SPDR® DoubleLine® Emerg Mkts Fxd Inc ETF's holdings is comparable to its peers in the Emerging Markets Fixed Income category, thus earning an average Morningstar Sustainability Rating of 3 globes. Funds in the same category rated 4 or 5 globes tend to hold securities less exposed to ESG risk. ESG risk measures the degree to which material environmental, social, and governance issues, such as climate change, biodiversity, human capital, as well as bribery and corruption, could affect valuations. ESG risk differs from impact, which is about driving positive environmental and social outcomes for society’s benefit.

One potential issue for a sustainability-focused investor is that SPDR® DoubleLine® Emerg Mkts Fxd Inc ETF doesn’t have an ESG-focused mandate. A fund with an ESG-focused mandate would have a higher probability to drive positive ESG outcomes. Currently, the fund has 38.9% involvement in fossil fuels. It is considered high in absolute terms, albeit roughly on par with 39.8% for its average category peer. Companies are considered involved in fossil fuels if they derive some revenue from thermal coal, oil, and gas. The fund has significant exposure (15.30%) to companies with high or severe controversies. Companies with controversies may be involved in incidents such as corruption, employee abuses, environmental incidents, and corporate scandals that pose some degree of business risks to the company. Severe and high controversies can have significant financial repercussions, ranging from legal penalties to consumer boycotts. Such controversies can also damage the reputation of both companies themselves and their shareholders.

SPDR® DoubleLine® Emerg Mkts Fxd Inc ETF has a 12-month asset-weighted Carbon Risk Score of 20.4. This is situated at the lower end of the medium carbon risk band, suggesting that its portfolio holdings are not among the worst-positioned to transition to a low-carbon economy, but they are not among the best-positioned either. Investors concerned about the transition risks may prefer to consider funds with negligible or low carbon risk. Such funds invest in companies that tend to operate in sectors less exposed to the transition (such as healthcare and IT) and/or companies in more carbon-intensive sectors (such as industrials and utilities) but that consider climate change in their business strategy and products, and therefore are positively aligned with the transition.

ESG Commitment Level Asset Manager