Skip to Content

Understanding the 4 Key Annuities Types

Annuities can offer valuable protection against clients outliving their assets, but they can also be high-cost and complicated. We dig into some pluses and minuses.

There's a long list of reasons why advisors tend to avoid annuities despite reams of academic literature suggesting that, if used correctly, they can be of real help to clients when it comes to retirement planning.

One reason fee-based advisors might avoid annuities would be because putting their clients' money into an annuity means that they won't earn money off those assets once they're in the hands of the insurer.

Or perhaps it's less self-centered than that. Many annuities are complex and often lack transparency. As a result, advisors have been scared away from even those annuities that are quite simple, relatively easy to understand, and of potential real use for their clients.

We launched a series in June that will aim to provide educational articles about annuities. In the first installment, I wrote about how to assess whether your clients even need an annuity in the first place. In this one, I'll take a closer look at four of the key annuity types: what they are, their benefits, costs, and key issues to assess around considering each one. While doing so, it's reasonable to think of them as a gradation, from least risky to most risky.

Immediate Income Annuity What It Is: Sometimes also called single premium immediate annuities, or SPIAs, they are the simplest annuities. They've been around for ages, and they're the product type often referenced in the academic literature as being additive to retirement plans. The basic idea is this: Clients give an insurance company a chunk of money, and in exchange the company sends it back to them as a fixed stream of income payments for the rest of their lives (or for a predetermined period of time). For example, a 70-year-old woman buying an immediate annuity with $100,000 today would receive about $530 in monthly income for the rest of her life, according to ImmmediateAnnuities.com. From that standpoint, such a product can be a complement to Social Security in that it's a guaranteed benefit that clients can't outlive, provided the insurer makes good on its obligations. At the same time, "It almost always make sense to delay claiming Social Security retirement benefits before buying a private annuity," says David Blanchett, head of retirement research for Morningstar Investment Management.

Who It's Best For: Simple immediate income annuities can be most attractive for people with tight retirement plans who want to ensure that their basic living expenses are covered by income sources that won't run out. In turn, they can invest their portfolios more for discretionary expenses. Needless to say, clients buying an annuity for guaranteed lifetime income should have longevity on their side, in that they benefit most from such a product if they live longer than the actuarial tables suggest they will and lose out if they live a shorter period of time. In this case, it is important to have a good handle on a client's health and family history.

Pros: Given that only 20% of workers are covered by pensions today, the guaranteed lifetime income afforded by immediate income annuities is their biggest attraction. Moreover, such annuities typically pay higher yields than pure investment products, largely because some of the annuity buyers in the pool will die earlier, plumping the total payments for all and making long-lived annuity buyers the winners. On the other hand, the payout they receive from an annuity isn't directly analogous to the yield they can earn from a bond, and that's because part of the return from an annuity is their own capital being sent back to them as a stream of income. This type of annuity also tends to be the lowest cost and most transparent of all annuity types; there aren't any hidden fees, which makes comparison shopping straightforward. And as with all annuities, there's an element of tax deferral associated with the product, though how much of a tax benefit depends on whether nonqualified dollars or qualified funds were used to purchase it.

Cons: While it's a stretch to call them drawbacks, there are a couple of considerations to bear in mind with immediate income annuities. One is that the product is only as good as the insurer behind it, which makes it important to focus on annuities offered by companies with high financial-strength ratings. At the same time, note that major insurers are generally well capitalized and have the backstop of state guarantee agencies if they should run into problems. (Investigating firms' financial strength will be the focus of a future article about annuities.)

It's also worth noting that the payout earned from an annuity depends in no small part on the interest rates that the insurer can earn through investing the annuitants' money. With interest rates as low as they are today, annuity payouts are also low relative to historic norms--but then again, bond and cash yields are also exceptionally low today. Managing insurance-company risk and the risk of purchasing the annuity at secularly low interest rates are key reasons that some experts who are enthusiastic about SPIAs recommend that laddering them--buying them in stages over several years--beats buying an annuity with a single purchase. The counterpoint, says Morningstar's Blanchett, is that you lose the implied mortality benefits you would earn by buying the product in a single purchase.

In addition, the fact that annuity payments are fixed means that inflation could eat away at purchasing power over time, unless clients buy an annuity that includes a fixed cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA. Such products typically have substantially lower initial payouts than would be received by putting the same amount into an annuity without COLA protection, though Blanchett points out that the benefits are really just being shuffled around. Finally, the richest payouts accrue to annuity buyers who are purchasing an annuity for their lifetime only, rather than a joint benefit or for a specific time period. Adding additional guarantees reduces the starting payment accordingly.

Deferred Income Annuity What It Is: These products, or DIAs, are quite similar to the aforementioned immediate annuities. The key difference is that with a deferred income annuity, payments start at some later date. For example, according to ImmediateAnnuities.com, a 70-year-old woman purchasing a deferred income annuity with $100,000 today would receive $2,100 per month starting at age 85. That's almost $1,600 more per month than the same purchaser would receive by buying a SPIA, but that's because the payments wouldn't start until 15 years from now.

Who It's Best For: Deferred income annuities are best suited for retirees about whom you feel confident will have enough retirement assets to sustain them through a specific period of time--to their average life expectancy, for example--but are worried about outliving their assets if they happen to live well beyond that. Among retirement researchers, these products are considered among the most effective hedges against outliving assets.

Pros: Because these products are purchased well before they begin making payouts and because some buyers may die early--even before they've started receiving payments or shortly thereafter--deferred income annuities can provide a lot of bang for the buck, enabling buyers to purchase a significant bulwark against outliving their assets later in life.

Moreover, one type of deferred annuity, called a qualified longevity annuity contract, or QLAC, allows an individual to steer up to $135,000 ($270,000 for married couples) from an IRA into a deferred annuity, thereby reducing the amount of the IRA that's subject to required minimum distributions. Though research from Blanchett and Michael Finke suggests that it's generally better to purchase annuities with aftertax dollars.

Cons: As with all other annuity types, insurer risk is a consideration, underscoring the importance of researching financial strength. And while inflation isn't a big issue at the moment, it could seriously erode the purchasing power of payments when you eventually begin receiving them. Very few deferred income annuities offer inflation protection, and policies that include cost-of-living adjustments tend to offer substantially lower payouts in exchange.

Fixed Indexed Annuity What It Is: While the aforementioned income annuities tend to offer low fixed payouts in exchange for stability, fixed indexed annuities, alternately called equity indexed annuities, aim to balance growth with loss avoidance. Designs of these products vary, but they generally use options to provide returns that are based on an equity index while also limiting losses. In other words, downside is capped, but upside potential is also capped, protecting the insurer's profitability.

For example, if the index that an annuity is linked to has a 10% return, but the participation rate is 70%, then a 7% return would be credited to the account owner. These crediting details often change every year as market conditions--especially option prices--change. From a practical standpoint, the long-term returns on equity indexed annuities tend to fall between stocks and high-quality bonds. Some of these products offer death benefit protection.

Who It's Best For: These products may be appropriate for investors who are seeking some growth potential but are skittish about the downside volatility associated with pure equity investments.

Pros: Fixed annuities, whether immediate or deferred, offer payouts that are heavily influenced by prevailing bond yields, which are ultralow today. By contrast, fixed indexed annuities derive most of their returns from equity market growth while also offering protection against losses. Given their potential to earn a higher rate of return than bonds but with a similar element of downside protection, fixed annuities, as some experts have argued, are a reasonable alternative to bonds in today's ultralow yield environment.

Cons: While these products offer protection against losses, they are far from free. Caps and participation rates cut into the percentage of equity market returns that buyers of these products typically enjoy, and they'll fluctuate based on option prices. The products can also be incredibly complicated; it can be difficult to understand the terms and to comparison shop among them.

Variable Annuity What It Is: While basic income annuities have very little risk and low return potential to match, variable annuities can entail a fair amount of risk, depending on the account owner's investment choice. Whereas the insurer directs the investment mix in the aforementioned products and in turn determines the risk/reward profile, a variable annuity owner is in the driver's seat, selecting among mutual fund-type accounts called subaccounts. The subaccounts on offer typically range from ultrasafe to higher-risk. The account value ebbs and flows based on those choices. The account owner also has the potential to annuitize--essentially, to switch on a stream of payments. However, in practice, more than 90% of variable-annuity owners never do.

Variable annuities also have insurance features called guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits, or GLWBs, which offer guaranteed lifetime income, albeit with an added cost.

Who It's Best For: Because they offer an element of tax deferral, variable annuities tend to be most appropriate for investors who have already maxed out their contributions to other tax-deferred vehicles, such as IRAs, and are seeking additional avenues for deferring taxes. But their high costs can dilute that benefit, as well as the long-term growth potential associated with the ability to invest in higher-risk assets like stocks.

Pros: Because of the broad array of investment types on offer within a variable annuity, these products enable account owners to build well-diversified portfolios of investments and potentially capture more equity market growth than they would with income annuities or equity-indexed annuities. They also include an element of tax deferral, discussed above. A key attraction of variable annuities are living benefit riders like GLWBs. These riders are similar in spirit to the equity indexed annuities, also discussed above, in that they offer downside protection but generally do not cap the upside. However, those features are far from free.

Cons: Although fees tend to be widely dispersed overall, some variable annuities feature exceptionally high costs, which can erode their growth over time. Thus, investors seeking growth who don't also have a need for the additional benefits the annuity confers, may be better off investing in an IRA or brokerage account. It's possible to obtain a decent amount of tax deferral with lower overall costs by buying and holding plain-vanilla exchange-traded funds or index funds in a taxable account.

More in Financial Advice

About the Author

Christine Benz

Director
More from Author

Christine Benz is director of personal finance and retirement planning for Morningstar, Inc. In that role, she focuses on retirement and portfolio planning for individual investors. She also co-hosts a podcast for Morningstar, The Long View, which features in-depth interviews with thought leaders in investing and personal finance.

Benz joined Morningstar in 1993. Before assuming her current role she served as a mutual fund analyst and headed up Morningstar’s team of fund researchers in the U.S. She also served as editor of Morningstar Mutual Funds and Morningstar FundInvestor.

She is a frequent public speaker and is widely quoted in the media, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, CNBC, and PBS. In 2020, Barron’s named her to its inaugural list of the 100 most influential women in finance; she appeared on the 2021 list as well. In 2021, Barron’s named her as one of the 10 most influential women in wealth management.

She holds a bachelor’s degree in political science and Russian language from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Sponsor Center