Why Private Equity Doesn't Belong in Defined-Contribution Plans
Contributor Scott Simon argues that private equity isn’t in any way a good thing for plan participants.
At the end of the 1942 film Casablanca, Humphrey Bogart’s character Rick Blaine smiles and says to Claude Rains’ Louis Renault: “Louie, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.” I thought of that line after reading the Information Letter released by the U.S. Department of Labor on June 3. It struck me that the letter represents the beginning of a beautiful friendship between the private-equities industry and participants in defined-contribution plans, such as 401(k) plans.
This friendship (at least from a private-equity standpoint) rests on the $8 trillion or so in assets held in 401(k), profit sharing, 403(b), and 457 plans as of the end of 2019 (according to the Investment Company Institute). Even if private equity were to capture only 5% of this market, that’s still $400 billion--and more, as the market for defined-contribution plans continues to grow.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.