Skip to Content
Sustainability Matters

Investing Has a Role to Play in Ending Systemic Racism

The way you invest matters.


Editor’s note: Read the latest on how the coronavirus is rattling the markets and what investors can do to navigate it.

Systemic racism doesn’t only have to do with how African Americans are treated by police and our justice system. That’s one dimension of a much broader problem. It is also responsible for the pandemic disproportionately impacting African Americans. And it’s responsible for deep-seated economic inequalities that we as a nation have failed to address.

To better understand the scope of the wealth gap, this Washington Post article, with its insightful charts, is a depressing but absolute must-read. As is this Brookings Institution report from February. And Christine Benz has compiled a comprehensive collection of statistics on the intersection of race, income and wealth.

Here are some highlights: 

  • The median net worth of a white household in the United States is 10 times greater than that of a black household, a disparity that has grown over the past half-century.
  • Having wealth means having a personal safety net to deal with life’s emergencies. Measuring by liquid assets, an average white family has six times more cash on hand that the average black family.
  • Having wealth eases the path to a college education and homeownership, both of which are also significant wealth creators. And, of course, having wealth provides the ability to build more of it through investing.

The Way You Invest Matters

Change has to come from many directions. If you are fortunate enough to be an investor, keep in mind that the way you invest matters. You have the means to contribute to change via your investments. I’m not saying the only action you should take is becoming an ESG or impact investor, but don’t fall for it if your financial advisor waves you off and urges you to just invest the way it’s always been done and give some of your gains to charity, as Ric Edelman did in Marketwatch earlier this month.

That’s a terrible and naive argument. Terrible because you can generate at least as much in returns via sustainable investing as you can by conventional means, leaving you with as much or more money for charitable donations.

Terrible, too, because it doesn’t recognize how much sustainable investors can impact corporate decision-making through direct engagement and proxy voting.

Naive because it suggests that corporate behavior isn’t connected to creating or solving societal problems. Corporations are not just money-makers for investors, who can take that money and, if they choose, use it to help solve societal problems through philanthropy. Corporations have a tremendous impact on the way we live our lives and they have helped structure--and have benefited from--the system we have now.

Through engagement and proxy voting, sustainable investors can push for change at the corporations they hold in their portfolios. Sustainable investors press companies on their diversity and inclusion policies, on the composition of their boards, on the way they compensate employees--particularly lower-wage workers whom we are more fully recognizing as essential during the pandemic, on labor relations generally, and on where corporate lobbying and political expenditures go.

Over the next year, you can bet that sustainable investors will closely question what corporations are doing to fight systemic racism.

Investors have the means to drive change. An all-out attack on systemic racism requires every tool in the box.

__________

Here is an example of how one prominent asset manager, Calvert Research and Management, intends to engage on systemic racism with companies it owns by asking companies to:

  • Provide the information required to accurately assess their racial diversity.

  • Provide pay equity disclosure across race and gender.

  • Publicly state what they are doing to combat racism and police brutality, including action taken to address failures in our education system.

__________

My colleague Jackie Cook wrote last week that employee welfare and political influence are among the big ESG issues that have been voted on at company annual general meetings so far this year.

With another month still to go in this year’s proxy season, a record number of environmental and social shareholder resolutions have passed with majority shareholder support in 2020. Since April, 17 resolutions have garnered at least 50% support: 

__________

From Nia Impact Capital’s founder and CEO Kristin Hull, seven actions investors can take to push for racial justice.

__________

Finally, here’s something every public company in the U.S. should do beginning right now:

  • Encourage every employee to register to vote and make it easy for them to do so.

  • Educate employees on their location's voting rules, poll locations, hours, early voting, absentee and mail-in voting, especially in those parts of the country that have erected barriers to voting.

  • Make sure every employee is given the time to vote, including paid time off if necessary. This is key because a conflicting work schedule is the biggest reason why people say they don't vote.

  • Given the likelihood that COVID-19 will still pose a threat to public health, educate employees about how to vote safely.

Our democracy is in peril. Corporations should step up in this moment to make sure everyone can vote, and vote safely, in 2020.

Jon Hale has been researching the fund industry since 1995. He is Morningstar’s director of ESG research for the Americas and a member of Morningstar's investment research department. While Morningstar typically agrees with the views Jon expresses on ESG matters, they represent his own views.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.