More People Going Out Has Employment Going Up
Restaurants and bars account for most of the surprising increase in jobs; our thesis holds that the long-term trend in GDP will not be significantly altered by the coronavirus.
|Editor's note: Read the latest on how the coronavirus is rattling the markets and what investors can do to navigate it.|
The increase in nonfarm payroll employment in May 2020 was completely unexpected. Not only were economists not able to forecast anywhere near the actual change in payrolls, they were not even able to get the direction correct. Employment increased by 2.5 million, completely shocking the market, which expected a decrease of 7.7 million.
Over half of the net rebound in employment in May was driven by restaurants and bars, which had accounted for 26% of the decline in April. Retail and construction also contributed strongly. This indicates that a relaxation of business shutdown orders contributed to the employment rebound. Also, the paycheck protection program, or PPP, encouraged businesses to retain workers even in industries where spending is still depressed (such as dine-in restaurants). Finally, fiscal stimulus broadly propped up spending in May, supporting our view that the unprecedentedly large U.S. fiscal policy response provides optimism on the economic recovery.
This economic report reveals how radically different the economic impact of the shut-ins from the pandemic has been as compared with prior economic disruptions. As a result, it underscores the inability for economic prognosticators to forecast short-term economic metrics and for investors to focus on the long term.
This situation highlights why we focus our analytical efforts on the long-term impact of the pandemic on the U.S. economy's gross domestic product. Based on our research, we think the impact of the coronavirus will be minimal to the long-term level of U.S. GDP. We expect only a 1% reduction to the level of GDP over the long term. Using a simple discounted cash flow analysis, that reduction would translate into only a 2% decrease in the fair value of the overall U.S. equity market from pre-COVID-19 valuations. Our long-term view on the level of GDP helped us stick to our valuations during the worst of the market downturn when other investors were liquidating positions. At the end of March, we noted that we thought the market was overreacting to the downside and that it was a good entry point for long-term investors.
The stock market immediately surged following the news as investors are pricing in a faster economic rebound. We agree with that view as our forecast for U.S. GDP in 2020 is for a decline of 3.9% as compared with Wall Street's consensus for a 5.8% decline. Following the rally off the March lows, we think that the stock market is fairly valued, yet we note that many sectors and individual stocks remain undervalued. While we think the market is back to fair value, we continue to believe that the long-term case for stocks in a balanced portfolio still stands.
Disclosure: This article has been written on behalf of Morningstar, Inc. and is not the view of DBRS Morningstar.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.