Skip to Content
Stock Analyst Update

Maintaining Gilead's FVE After Solid Remdesivir Data

Mentioned:

Gilead (GILD) released solid results from its second Simple study of remdesivir on June 1, and we're not making any changes to our $83 fair value estimate. The study focused on hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19; patients had pneumonia but normal oxygen levels. Patients assigned to the five-day dosing schedule for remdesivir were 65% more likely to see a clinical improvement than patients receiving prior standard of care. Overall, we think this fits well with prior data from the Actt-1 study (showing improved recovery time and a trend toward a mortality benefit, particularly among patients receiving oxygen) and the Simple-severe study (showing that five and 10-day remdesivir dosing produced similar outcomes, effectively increasing the number of treatment courses available).

Remdesivir continues to look like an effective drug that significantly benefits patients who were too sick to recover on their own but not so sick that they had already progressed to mechanical ventilation. Based on the steady data from remdesivir and management comments on costs of production that were higher than our assumptions, we've updated our Gilead model and now use a $1,000 price for commercial sales of remdesivir (we still assume a 100% probability of approval around mid-2020) as well as a $250 price for future stockpiling. We've lowered our probability of stockpiling back to 40% from 60%, as progress with vaccines is moving faster than we had anticipated, which could reduce the need for antivirals by 2022 and 2023. Overall, this leads to $1.7 billion in potential remdesivir sales in 2020 and a peak of $2.5 billion in sales in 2021, with sales excluded from our model after 2023. While remdesivir is an example of the sort of innovative antiviral medicines coming from Gilead's pipeline, which has created a portfolio of HIV and hepatitis C drugs that support a wide moat, we don't think the drug will have a large and sustained impact on Gilead's future cash flows.

Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.

Karen Andersen does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.