Skip to Content

Dividends or Buybacks: Which Is Better?

Dividends or Buybacks: Which Is Better?

Karen Wallace: Hi, I'm Karen Wallace for Morningstar. What's the best way for companies to return profits to shareholders? I want to introduce you to one of my colleagues who spends a lot of time thinking about that question. This is Dan Lefkovitz. He's a strategist in Morningstar's Indexes group.

Dan, thanks so much for being here.

Dan Lefkovitz: Thanks for having me, Karen.

Wallace: So, what are the two main ways that companies share their profits with investors, and what are sort of the pros and cons of each one?

Lefkovitz: Sure. Well, investors love dividends. Especially, in this day and age of ultralow interest rates and demographics being what they are, increasing numbers of investors are looking for income from their investment portfolios. Dividends are straightforward, cash in hand. There's also a total-return story to dividends. Dividends enforce discipline on management. They have to deliver that dividend payment. Share buybacks are more indirect. Now, vis-à-vis dividends, they are more flexible. A company can buy back its own shares when it has cash on hand opportunistically. It's not the kind of straitjacket that the dividend payment is. But the buyback, the share repurchase, does increase fractional ownership for remaining shareholders. So, they both are ways that a company can return cash to shareholders. Share buybacks get criticized for being mistimed, valuation considerations, born of questionable motives, they're often perceived as benefiting management at the expense of shareholders. Tax consequences to dividends are--share buybacks are tax-advantaged relative to dividends. So, pros and cons.

Wallace: So, Dan, which is better from a shareholder perspective?

Lefkovitz: So, we actually think that dividends versus share buybacks is something of a false dichotomy. The fact is that many companies these days do both. And market dynamics have really changed over the past few decades. Share buybacks have become a lot more prominent and have, in fact, eclipsed dividends as a means of returning cash to shareholders. So, the fact is that today's market share buybacks are really big. We know that the dividend yield on the U.S. market is much lower than it used to be. But if you add back in buyback yield and if you look at total shareholder yield, it's more in line with historical averages. And we really think it's useful to think about the total payout of the market. My colleague Philip Straehl in Morningstar Investment Management has done a lot of work on this total payout model, which is a helpful means not just of representing overall market yield but also valuing the market.

Wallace: So, you and your colleagues have spent a lot of time researching this topic and putting together an index. How do you find companies that are standouts in terms of returning cash through this total shareholder yield?

Lefkovitz: So, we built an index several years ago based on this concept of total shareholder yield. It's called the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. And very simply, it just selects companies that are returning cash to shareholders through dividends, through buybacks, or a combination thereof, and it weights constituents by total payout dollar. So, it considers market capitalization as well as dividend and buyback yield. And we find that when you look for buybacks or dividends or a combination, you broaden the investment opportunity set, you broaden the fishing pool. So, about 1,200 U.S. companies are eligible for the index. The overall dividend yield is above-market. It's attractive from an income perspective. But if you think about total yield, buyback plus dividends, it's even more attractive.

Wallace: We have a list of some undervalued components here and I'll link that in the video notes. Thank you so much for being here. This is really interesting research, Dan.

Lefkovitz: Thanks, Karen.

Wallace: For Morningstar, I'm Karen Wallace. Thanks for watching.

Morningstar, Inc. licenses indexes to financial institutions as the tracking indexes for investable products, such as exchange-traded funds, sponsored by the financial institution. The license fee for such use is paid by the sponsoring financial institution based mainly on the total assets of the investable product. A list of investable products that track or have tracked a Morningstar index is available on the resources tab at indexes.morningstar.com. Morningstar, Inc. does not market, sell, or make any representations regarding the advisability of investing in any investable product that tracks a Morningstar index.

More in Portfolios

About the Authors

Dan Lefkovitz

Strategist
More from Author

Dan Lefkovitz is strategist for Morningstar Indexes, responsible for producing research supporting Morningstar’s index capabilities across a range of asset classes. He contributes to the Morningstar Direct℠ Research Portal, authors white papers, and frequently hosts webinars on index-related topics.

Before assuming his current role in 2015, he spent 11 years on Morningstar’s manager research team. He held several different roles, including analyst and director of the company’s institutional research service. From 2008 to 2012, he was based in London, helping to build Morningstar’s fund research capability across Europe and Asia. Lefkovitz also participated in the development of the Morningstar Analyst Rating™, the Global Fund Report, and edited the Fidelity Fund Family report from 2006 to 2008.

Before joining Morningstar in 2004, Lefkovitz served as director of risk analysis for Marvin Zonis + Associates, a Chicago-based consultancy. During this time, he coauthored The Kimchi Matters: Global Business and Local Politics in a Crisis-Driven World (Agate, 2003).

Lefkovitz holds a bachelor's degree from the University of Michigan and a master's degree from the University of Chicago.

Karen Wallace

Director
More from Author

Sponsor Center