Skip to Content
Stock Analyst Update

Juggling Mixed Signals, Fed Lowers Rates

We still view at least one or two more cuts over the next year as the most likely outcome.

At the conclusion of its September meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee voted to decrease its target rate range to 1.75%-2% from 2%-2.25%. For the third consecutive time under Chairman Jerome Powell's tenure, the vote was not unanimous, with Esther George and Eric Rosengren voting for no change to the benchmark rate. George and Rosengren previously dissented following the July meeting, and both continue to favor holding rates steady. St. Louis Fed President James Bullard also dissented and preferred a heftier cut of 50 basis points. The much anticipated Fed dot plot showed seven members favor one additional cut this year, five prefer keeping rates as-is, and five think rates would be more appropriate in the 2%-2.25% range (at least three of these voters are non-voting).

The language in the Fed's statement highlighted the continually soft business fixed investment and lower inflation, and noted uncertainties around the future outlook. In the press conference, Powell also mentioned trade policy tensions and slowing global growth as reasons for the rate cut. The Fed maintained language on acting "to sustain the expansion," indicating a further willingness to make "insurance" rate cuts. A big question for us was whether Jerome Powell still considered rate cuts to be "midcycle" adjustments. Though Powell avoided directly answering the question, we got the sense the cut was more of the midcycle variety, rather than the "beginning of a lengthy cutting cycle." We still view at least one or two more cuts over the next year as the most likely outcome.

Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.