No Changes to J&J After Oklahoma Opioid Case Ruling
The $572 million payment amount for Johnson & Johnson is lower than expected, and the wide-moat firm plans to appeal the case.
In one of the first state opioid cases, an Oklahoma judge ruled against Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), awarding the state $572 million, well below the over $17 billion the state was seeking in damages. The amount is lower than many had expected, and J&J still plans to appeal the case. We expect the appeals process to take several years, and on appeal, we believe the amount will fall lower as we believe J&J largely provided appropriate marketing support around its opioid drug sales. Overall, we don't expect any change to our fair value estimate or moat rating for the company based on the ruling, and we continue to model in $1 billion in total opioid litigation costs for J&J.
The next steps in the opioid litigation process include other state cases and a likely long appeals process. Following the Oklahoma ruling, we expect an Ohio case will represent the next important step in determining the magnitude of the overall opioid litigation. The lack of early settlements by opioid drugmakers in Ohio (like Purdue's settlement in Oklahoma) suggest this state could be less sympathetic to the plaintiffs. Also, regardless of the outcome in Ohio, we expect the ruling will be similarly appealed, setting up a process that will likely take several years to complete.
The strong balance sheet at J&J likely entices many plaintiffs to target the firm. Within the opioid litigation landscape, plaintiffs are targeting several industries and firms for potentially causing addiction and overdoses of these powerful drugs. However, J&J holds one of the strongest balance sheets and most robust streams of cash flows, which makes it a larger target than many of the smaller specialty drug firms that carry much weaker financial positions. Even though J&J's opioid sales represent a small fraction of the overall prescriptions of opioid sales (less than 1% of state paid opioid prescriptions), we believe the deep pockets of J&J have made the firm a larger target than its opioid sales would suggest.
|Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.|
Damien Conover does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.