Can Under Armour Compete?
We do not expect to change our fair value estimate for the no-moat firm.
No-moat Under Armour’s (UA) 2019 second-quarter report affirms our view that it is struggling to regain brand strength and that shares are overvalued. Although the quarterly report was in line with expectations, shares dropped by a low teens percentage as investors were concerned about the 3.2% year-over-year decline in North America sales and the outlook for the rest of 2019. While the decline in North America sales was expected (we had forecast a 4% drop), the lack of momentum in either the wholesale or direct-to-consumer businesses in North America is disappointing. Under Armour expected revenue growth of 3%-4% for 2019, including a slight decline in North America sales. Despite its efforts, we do not believe Under Armour has established a premium brand. We forecast an average annual operating margin of 8% in 2021-28, well below Under Armour’s long-term expectation of operating margins above 10%. We do not think it can achieve sustained premium pricing. Its merchandise is frequently discounted at no-moat retailers like Dick’s Sporting Goods and Kohl’s. Moreover, Under Armour operates 165 outlets in North America but just 16 full-price stores. We believe some competitors, including wide-moat Nike and narrow-moat Adidas, are having better success with their wholesale and direct-to-consumer efforts in the U.S. and other markets because they have stronger brands and more diversified products.
Under Armour’s full-year outlook met our expectations. We do not expect much product innovation this year, but new products in 2020 will be critical. We do not expect to change our fair value estimate of $17.10 and continue to view shares as overvalued.
|Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.|
David Swartz does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.