Basic Materials: Opportunities Surface Amid Share Price Declines
We're especially keen on the uranium, lithium, and lumber industries.
We're especially keen on the uranium, lithium, and lumber industries.
The Morningstar U.S. Materials Index has underperformed the broader market over the trailing one-year period (Exhibit 1), as trade tensions escalated and weighed on the growth outlook. As a result, a handful of stocks now trade in 5-star territory (Exhibit 2).
BMat Has Underperformed, but We See Opportunities - source: Morningstar Analysts
Underperformance has led to 30% of coverage in 4- or 5-star territory - source: Morningstar Analysts
The Trump administration has taken an aggressive approach to renegotiating trade relationships that it sees as unfair to the U.S., particularly with China. Positive and negative impacts have been felt across numerous materials industries, including steel, gold, and agriculture. With the ultimate resolution and timing unclear, uncertainty weighs on sector valuations. However, some portions of the materials sector are more insulated from U.S. trade efforts than others, creating opportunities in uranium, lithium, and lumber.
Through the first half of 2019, uranium spot prices have fallen more than 15% to roughly $24 per pound, weighed by the threat of actions resulting from a U.S. national security investigation into import dependence and weak spot market activity. Although the market-implied price suggests little recovery left, we disagree. We believe production discipline will continue to help address industry oversupply, leading to a recovery of prices to $65 per pound by 2021.
We are bullish in our outlook for lithium. Although we forecast lithium carbonate prices to slightly decline in 2019 real terms from $12,915 per metric ton (on a Chilean export basis) to $12,000, we are well above consensus-implied prices of $8,000 due to our above-consensus electric vehicle adoption forecast of 15% in 2028 versus consensus of 11.1% (Exhibit 3).
Our above-consensus forecast for EV adoption underpins our lithium forecast - source: Morningstar Analysts
Although we’ve lowered our housing forecast over the near and medium term, we remain above consensus. We see a gradual climb toward our midcycle forecast of just over 1.4 million units constructed annually, as aging millennials require a growing housing stock after reducing the number of vacant units. Despite student debt burdens and poor real-wage growth, aging is the single largest driver of new-home demand in the long run (Exhibit 4).
Aging millennials will drive a gradual climb in new-home construction - source: Morningstar Analysts
Top Picks
Canfor (CFP)
Star Rating: 4 Stars
Economic Moat: None
Fair Value Estimate: CAD 17
Fair Value Uncertainty: High
Canfor is our preferred way to play U.S. housing within the wood products space. Shares trade nearly 50% below our CAD 17 fair value estimate. Lumber companies often trade closely with prevailing lumber prices. Following a recent rise in supply and slump in demand, lumber prices are severely depressed. We expect demand to gradually climb with new homes built in the United States, and ongoing supply cuts should rebalance the market, improving margins. Over the long run, we’re confident that Canfor will be able to earn its cost of capital based on our midcycle lumber price forecast.
Cameco (CCJ)
Star Rating: 5 Stars
Economic Moat: Narrow
Fair Value Estimate: $19
Fair Value Uncertainty: High
Weak spot market demand and a federal investigation on the security of U.S. supply have weighed on uranium prices in 2019, but we don’t see either issue as a lingering risk. Meanwhile, long-term demand continues to grow as China brings more nuclear reactors on line. The consensus view expects little upside for prices, but we disagree. The still-improving supply/demand balance should help increase uranium prices, allowing Cameco to eventually resume full operations at more attractive margins.
Albemarle (ALB)
Star Rating: 5 Stars
Economic Moat: Narrow
Fair Value Estimate: $130
Fair Value Uncertainty: High
Narrow-moat Albemarle trades at a nearly 50% discount to our $130 fair value estimate, as the market is concerned that lower lithium prices will weigh on profits. However, with nearly all lithium volumes under contract through 2021, Albemarle should generate steady profits. We contend that higher lithium prices will be needed to incentivize lower-quality supply to meet demand from growing electric vehicle adoption. With low-cost lithium production, Albemarle is well positioned to grow profits. We think current share prices are an attractive entry point for a quality lithium producer.
Kristoffer Inton does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.