Skip to Content

How to Benchmark Your Portfolio

If you’re evaluating your portfolio, make sure you’re using a benchmark that reflects what you’re actually trying to see.

An illustrative image of Christine Benz, director of personal finance and retirement planning of Morningstar.

“How am I doing?”

It's one of the most basic questions an investor can ask, but answering it isn't always straightforward.

For starters, common yardsticks of market performance, such as the S&P 500 or the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, assume that an investor is fully invested in that asset class—all stocks or all bonds. Few investors are. Comparing your performance with that of an S&P 500 index fund, or even a total stock market index fund, is a poor choice unless your portfolio is 100% U.S. stocks. Instead, it’s better to compare your results with a benchmark that roughly matches your own portfolio’s asset allocation; I’ll talk about where to go for that type of intelligence below.

Yet even as such a bespoke benchmark is an advance over a single-asset-class benchmark like the S&P 500, it serves the single goal of helping you assess your security selection. It makes no judgment about your asset-allocation choices. For example, you may have managed to shred the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index’s performance with your all-bond retirement portfolio. But if you’re only in your 30s, you may still not meet your goals because you’ve stuck with a portfolio that’s too conservative given your life stage. What you need more than anything is a check on the reasonableness of having so much in bonds in the first place.

No matter what type of “How am I doing?” question you’re attempting to answer (and you’ll probably have more than one at various points in time), here are some benchmarks you can use to help you make a well-considered assessment.

If you want to see whether your security choices have added or subtracted value:

As noted above, one of the best ways to keep tabs on whether you’re helping or hurting returns with your stock, mutual fund, or exchange-traded fund selections is to create a custom benchmark of inexpensive index funds or ETFs that mirrors your portfolio’s asset allocation (or your target allocation). Such a benchmark is not just a worthwhile check of your security-selection acumen but also a lens into whether you could be running a portfolio that’s simpler and cheaper than what you have.

If you have a portfolio saved on Morningstar.com, use the X-Ray tab to determine your portfolio’s current asset allocation; you can then use that allocation to inform the weightings for your custom benchmark. For example, let’s say X-Ray shows that you have 42% in U.S. stocks, 22% in foreign stocks, 23% in bonds, and 13% in cash. Assuming you have a $1 million portfolio, your custom benchmark could consist of $420,000 in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF VTI, $220,000 in Vanguard Total International Stock ETF VXUS, $230,000 in Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF BND, and $130,000 in cash. Enter those holdings and save them as a portfolio.

If, over time, it turns out that your actual portfolio is consistently lagging your custom benchmark, you might consider calling it a day and going all-in with total market index funds.

If you want to gauge the reasonableness of your portfolio’s asset allocation:

The preceding benchmarking jobs all assume that you’re working with some type of asset-allocation target and that you’re comfortable with it. Based on my interactions with investors, that’s not always the case; many investors view asset allocation as black-boxy, and they don’t know where to start. For investors who are saving for retirement, the Morningstar Lifetime Allocation Index weightings can be a guide. My various model portfolios for retirement savers and accumulators can also be useful for benchmarking purposes. While most of the portfolios are geared toward retirement, I’ve developed portfolios for short- and intermediate-term goals, too.

If you want to see if you’re on track to reach your goals:

Ultimately, this is the mother of all benchmarking questions, and it’s one that we should all ask ourselves at least once a year, ideally as part of an annual portfolio review. I like Fidelity’s age-based retirement savings targets for a quickie view of whether a savings program needs to be stepped up. Vanguard’s Retirement Nest Egg Calculator considers a few more variables and is easy to use. If you have a bit more time, you can turn to a more holistic retirement-savings calculator that factors in numerous variables, such as asset allocation, tax treatment of investments, and Social Security. The Bogleheads site has a useful compendium of such calculators, many of them free, including T. Rowe Price’s Retirement Income Calculator and The Flexible Retirement Planner. Because all of these calculators employ different methodologies—and because the viability of your retirement savings/spending plan is such a crucial question—it is worthwhile to sample a few of them for a range of opinions.

A version of this article previously appeared on Feb. 25, 2019.

The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

More in Stocks

About the Author

Christine Benz

Director
More from Author

Christine Benz is director of personal finance and retirement planning for Morningstar, Inc. In that role, she focuses on retirement and portfolio planning for individual investors. She also co-hosts a podcast for Morningstar, The Long View, which features in-depth interviews with thought leaders in investing and personal finance.

Benz joined Morningstar in 1993. Before assuming her current role she served as a mutual fund analyst and headed up Morningstar’s team of fund researchers in the U.S. She also served as editor of Morningstar Mutual Funds and Morningstar FundInvestor.

She is a frequent public speaker and is widely quoted in the media, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, CNBC, and PBS. In 2020, Barron’s named her to its inaugural list of the 100 most influential women in finance; she appeared on the 2021 list as well. In 2021, Barron’s named her as one of the 10 most influential women in wealth management.

She holds a bachelor’s degree in political science and Russian language from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Sponsor Center