Investors Continue to Favor Taxable-Bond Funds
Taxable-bond funds led all groups in terms of flows in September, but interest in U.S. equity funds bounced back.
Taxable-bond funds led all groups in terms of flows in September, but interest in U.S. equity funds bounced back.
It appears 2018 will be the third consecutive year that taxable-bond funds receive the greatest inflows among Morningstar's eight U.S. category groups. Investors shoveled $20.9 billion into taxable-bond funds in September, nearing $189 billion during 2018. That's about half of 2017's $390 billion calendar year total, though it's nearing 2016's $196 billion total.
As we have discussed previously, taxable-bond demand seems to fall into three segments. First, investors are moving money into core, intermediate-term bond funds. This category received about $6.1 billion in September and leads all taxable-bond categories with about $55 billion year to date. These inflows may reflect investors rebalancing and shifting money from equity funds. Second, rate-sensitive investors are pouring money into ultrashort-bond funds. This category collected $5.3 billion in September and is just behind intermediate-term bond funds for the year to date with about $54 billion. Finally, long government funds received about $3.6 billion in September inflows. These funds have historically diversified equity portfolios well, but their 2018 success is still surprising. The category has been hammered by rising interest rates, and the average fund is down 8.7% through October 9. Nevertheless, investors have funneled about $15.4 billion into these funds during 2018.
Core strategies are still the most popular across asset classes. For both U.S. equity and international equity, it's core, large-blend funds, and then everything else. Large-blend U.S. equity funds collected $9.1 billion of the group's overall $10.5 billion flows. For the year to date, large-blend funds have absorbed $35.4 billion versus overall U.S. equity's $5.8 billion, meaning the remaining eight categories have experienced collective net outflows this year.
Within international equity, foreign large-blend funds received $3.9 billion compared with the entire category group's $850 million in inflows, implying the remaining categories suffered modest net outflows. For the year to date, foreign large-blend funds have taken in $72.6 billion versus $89.3 billion for all international equity.
Conversely, world large-stock funds had $1.3 billion of outflows in September, the greatest among international equity funds. Investors had little interest in some other world strategies, with world allocation funds losing $2.1 billion in outflows.
Download the complete Asset Flows Commentary here. |
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.