Our Take on the Quarter's Best-Performing Funds
It might not be 1999 again, but tech funds are at the top of the charts.
It might not be 1999 again, but tech funds are at the top of the charts.
We've always warned about the perils of chasing short-term performance, and this quarter's top-performing funds are no exception. While most stock-fund categories have continued to bleed red ink for the year to date through March 17, 2003, funds that invest in technology-related stocks have hit the top of the charts. Some investors have been speculating on an upturn in the semiconductor cycle, and other tech-related industries such as wireline equipment and data networking have also bounced higher in the hopes of better days ahead.
Investors should bear in mind that technology funds are highly specialized offerings that carry a considerable amount of risk, though. Their hefty expense ratios are another drawback.
With commodity prices surging, Oppenheimer Real Asset has been another top performer. The fund has benefited from higher prices on oil, gas, and other commodities. But this fund also fills a highly specialized role and is probably too volatile for most investors' portfolios.
To learn more about our take on 2003's standouts, Premium Members can click on the Analyst Report links below.
Top-Performing Funds in 2003's First Quarter* | |||
Year-to-Date | Net Assets ( $mil ) | Morningstar Rating | |
Amerindo Technology Fund has huge positions in Internet stocks, and its ups and downs can be extreme. Read the full Analyst Report. | 16.88 | 59 | |
Gut-wrenching losses illustrate the downside of ProFunds UltraOTC's (UOPIX) leveraged approach. Read the full Analyst Report. | 16.40 | 167 | |
Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) is about as risky as they come, and its concentrated portfolio leads to extreme gyrations in returns. Read the full Analyst Report. | 12.35 | 241 | |
Diversification benefits alone may not be enough to convince investors to find a place for Oppenheimer Real Asset Fund . Read the full Analyst Report. | 11.29 | 224 | |
RS Information Age Fund (RSIFX) has a shot at succeeding in a sustained tech rally, but it's so risky that it's probably inappropriate for the vast majority of investors. Read the full Analyst Report. | 10.33 | 51 | |
TCW Galileo Aggressive Growth Equities simply has too much sector- and issue-specific risk. Investors seeking mid-cap growth exposure can find smoother rides with a more diversified portfolio elsewhere. Read the full Analyst Report. | 9.76 | 97 | |
Enterprise Technology Fund has a broader take on the Internet sector than most, and management will hold mainstream technology and even some nontechnology stocks alongside pure-play dot-coms. Read the full Analyst Report. | 9.63 | 52 | |
AXP Global Technology fared poorly in its inaugural two years, but things are finally looking up. The new management team includes an ex-Fidelity tech-fund manager. Read the full Analyst Report. | 9.43 | 126 | N/A |
Berkshire Focus Fund's (BFOCX) history leaves much to be desired, and we're also bearish about its prospects. Read the full Analyst Report. | 9.19 | 23 | |
Alliance Emerging Market Debt (AGDAX) is much too risky for conservative and mainstream bond investors. Intrepid emerging-markets-bond fans with long time horizons, on the other hand, should check it out. Read the full Analyst Report. | 9.16 | 252 | |
* Table includes the top-performing funds in Morningstar's coverage universe. Data is through 03-17-03. |
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.