Skip to Content
Stock Analyst Update

Florence's Financial Impact Minimal for Scana

We expect regulators will allow the utility to recover any large storm expenses, resulting in little effect on shareholders.


We are reaffirming our $56 fair value estimate for  Scana (SCG) after Tropical Storm Florence hit the Carolinas on Sept. 13-15, including the service territory for South Carolina Electric & Gas. We also are reaffirming our narrow moat and stable moat trend ratings.

We expect Florence will have a minor financial impact on Scana. Outages in SCE&G's service territory peaked at 7,593 on Sept. 15, representing only 1% of its total customer base. For all utilities in South Carolina, peak outages hit just 4% of total statewide customers, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Virtually all customers had service restored by Sept. 17. We expect regulators will allow Scana to recover any large storm expenses, resulting in little impact on shareholders.

We find no justification for Scana's 14% stock price drop since early August. The market also has turned bearish on Dominion's proposed acquisition. Scana now trades at a 25% discount to its deal-implied price as of Sept. 17. This is the widest spread since February and up from 13% in early August. We estimate the market is assuming just a 5% probability that regulators will approve the deal. Scana would realize 33% upside if the deal closes. 

We assume a 75% probability that South Carolina regulators approve the deal. This adds $1 per share to our stand-alone base-case fair value estimate based on our $84 fair value estimate for Dominion. If regulators reject the deal, our Scana fair value estimate would range from $32 per share in our bear case to $68 per share in our bull case. Scana's value will depend primarily on how much money regulators allow it to charge customers for its abandoned new nuclear project.

If regulators maintain the recently enacted 15% temporary rate cut, we would probably cut our fair value estimate to $40 per share. Our bull case assumes regulators approve full nuclear project rate recovery per the state's 2007 Baseload Review Act.

Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.

Travis Miller does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.