Oracle: Despite Decent Results, We're Not Wowed
Our opinion of the wide-moat firm's cloud positioning and growth prospects remain tepid, especially when measured with competitors like Microsoft, Salesforce, and Workday.
Oracle (ORCL) had a decent start to the fiscal year, although total reported cloud services and license support revenue growth was slightly disappointing. Similar to last quarter, the company reported healthy metrics for its database and NetSuite businesses, but our opinion of the firm’s cloud positioning and growth prospects remain tepid, especially when measured with competitors like Microsoft, Salesforce, and Workday. In the public cloud, we believe Oracle remains a laggard versus industry leaders such as Amazon and Microsoft, despite management touting the success of its autonomous cloud database product. We maintain our wide economic moat rating for Oracle and believe the firm can retain the bulk of its application software customers. With many on-premises customers still yet to move their back-office applications to the cloud, we see this as a moderate growth opportunity for Oracle’s application ecosystem business over the medium term. After slightly adjusting our model for the latest quarter and accounting for a modestly better application ecosystem outlook, we raise our fair value estimate to $49 per share from $46. With shares trading close to our fair value estimate, we’d seek a wider margin of safety before considering the stock for investment.
For the quarter, total revenue rose 1% year over year to $9.2 billion (up 2% in constant currency). Cloud services and license support revenue (72% of total revenue) grew 4% year over year in constant currency to $6.6 billion, buoyed by 7% application ecosystem growth. Meanwhile, cloud license and on-premises license revenue was flat at $867 million. With the reclassified revenue segmentation last quarter, Oracle’s individual cloud segment performance remains murky and it will be difficult to predict future performance, which gives us caution around its ability to compete with well-positioned peers.
|Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.|
William Fitzsimmons does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.