Skip to Content

Round Out Your Large-Cap U.S. Stock Fund With This ETF

This well-diversified offering pairs well with the S&P 500.

Mid- and small-cap stocks are usually riskier investment propositions than their large-cap brethren. They tend to have less-established competitive advantages and are more sensitive to the economic cycle. But they offer diversification benefits and may compensate investors with higher returns.

The fund tracks the S&P Completion Index, a market-cap-weighted index which targets stocks that land outside of the S&P 500. Market-cap weighting skews the fund toward the largest names outside of the S&P 500, but it reaches further down the market-cap spectrum than most mid-blend Morningstar Category peers and straddles the mid- and small-cap size segment breakpoint. Indeed, its average market capitalization is about half that of the category average. The fund’s broad reach and market-cap weighting should help it effectively diversify firm-specific risk.

By using market capitalization to weight its holdings, the fund relies on the cumulative knowledge incorporated in stock prices to size its positions. While market participants have done a good job valuing stocks over the long term, the market has gone through episodes of mania and panic. But this risk is worth the cost advantage gained from market-cap weighting. Market-cap-weighted index funds are cheaper to run than most actively managed funds because they require fewer investment personnel and their low turnover translates to low transaction costs. The fund’s turnover during the past decade measured a fraction of the average fund in the category.

The fund further reduces its turnover by using representative sampling to effectively track its underlying index. Smaller, less-liquid stocks are usually more expensive to trade than large-cap stocks. The fund keeps costs down by sampling among the smallest stocks in the index while accurately maintaining an accurate representation of its characteristics.

During the trailing decade through July 2018, the fund has performed well, topping the mid-cap blend category average by 2.4 percentage points each year with slightly more volatility. Its cost advantage and greater exposure to small- and micro-cap stocks were the biggest contributors to its outperformance.

Fundamental View Broadly diversified, market-cap-weighted index funds, like this one, earn a durable edge from efficient portfolio construction. The fund's broad, market-cap-weighted portfolio accurately represents its peers' opportunity set. Stock prices, which drive the fund's weightings, quickly incorporate new information and reflect the collective wisdom of the market (or madness of the crowd).

There are some drawbacks to market-cap weighting. By design, market-cap weighting increases the fund’s exposure to stocks as they become larger and more expensive, and reduces its exposure to names as they become smaller and cheaper, which may have higher expected returns. Index funds also remain fully invested. Staying fully invested reduces the fund’s cash drag and helps performance during bull markets, but provides less cushion during market downturns.

Although the fund relies on others to set the prices and weightings of its holdings, it benefits from low turnover and transaction costs that outweigh the drawbacks of market-cap weighting. The Vanguard portfolio management team uses representative sampling among the smallest stocks in the index to further reduce turnover and transaction costs. The fund would likely incur unnecessarily high transaction costs to fully replicate the index because the index delves far down the market-cap spectrum, and small stocks are more expensive to trade than large names. Instead, the portfolio managers sample among the smallest names to avoid trading them when it doesn’t materially affect the characteristics of the fund. During the past decade through 2017, this fund’s turnover measured just 11% compared with 79% for the average fund in the mid-blend category.

Market-cap-weighted index funds carry lower cash balances than their actively managed counterparts, which helps performance during bull markets but hurts it during bear markets. For example, this fund lost 58 percentage points during the bear market from October 2007 through March 2009, slightly more than the average mid-blend fund during this time period. But because index funds stay nearly fully invested, they won’t miss the upside. From the trough of the bear market in March 2009 through July 2018, this fund returned 20.3% annually compared with 18.2% for the average fund in the category.

The fund’s higher ownership of smaller stocks likely led to its slightly higher risk than the category average over the past decade through July 2018. But the fund’s broad diversification should help mitigate firm-specific risk. Its market-cap-weighting approach skews the fund toward the largest stocks excluded from the S&P 500. Its portfolio straddles Morningstar’s mid- and small-cap size segments. And the fund’s average market capitalization is about one third that of the mid-cap blend’s average.

Most of the fund’s sector weightings are comparable to the mid-blend category average. As of this writing, the fund has slightly more exposure to stocks in the real estate and healthcare sectors, but holds fewer materials sectors stocks compared with the mid-cap blend category. And most likely because this fund dips into smaller-cap stocks, it tends to invest in less-profitable companies than most category peers.

Portfolio Construction The fund diversifies risk and keeps turnover low by tracking the S&P Completion Index, a broad market-cap-weighted index that represents nearly every U.S. stock outside of the S&P 500, supporting its Positive Process Pillar rating.

The fund reduces transaction costs by sampling among the smallest, most illiquid stocks, but it still holds nearly every stock in the index. Relative to other indexes, the S&P 500 uses more restrictive criteria before adding a stock to the index, such as evidence of financial viability and that at least 50% of a company's shares float publicly. Since the Completion Index is designed to be the complement of the S&P 500, it contains stocks that do not meet the S&P 500’s inclusion criteria. Therefore, unlike most mid- or small-cap index funds, this fund contains a smattering of large-cap names, which can have an outsize influence on the portfolio, as they did in 2000.

Because the S&P 500 requires six to 12 months of seasoning before initial public offerings are included, the Completion Index will hold IPOs sooner. Stocks added to the S&P 500 are removed from the Completion Index, and stocks dropped from the S&P 500 are added to the Completion Index if they still qualify for inclusion in S&P indexes. This fund minimizes its cash drag by using derivatives to equitize cash.

Fees This fund levies a low fee of 0.08%, which is a fraction of the 0.97% median levy its mid-cap blend category peers charge, meriting a Positive Price Pillar rating.

During the trailing three years through July 2018, the fund outpaced its benchmark by 13 basis points per year. This implies the fund has been able to more than offset the drag created by its fee through a combination of savvy portfolio-management techniques and securities lending.

Alternatives

Investors have a variety of choices to obtain exposure to mid- and small-cap stocks. Within the Vanguard family of funds, there is Gold-rated

Capturing the entire U.S. stock market in one fell swoop is more cost-efficient. Those looking for exposure to the total stock market might consider Gold-rated

There is also

Disclosure: Morningstar, Inc. licenses indexes to financial institutions as the tracking indexes for investable products, such as exchange-traded funds, sponsored by the financial institution. The license fee for such use is paid by the sponsoring financial institution based mainly on the total assets of the investable product. Please click here for a list of investable products that track or have tracked a Morningstar index. Neither Morningstar, Inc. nor its investment management division markets, sells, or makes any representations regarding the advisability of investing in any investable product that tracks a Morningstar index.

More in ETFs

About the Author

Adam McCullough

Senior Analyst
More from Author

Adam McCullough, CFA, is a senior manager research analyst for Morningstar Research Services LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Morningstar, Inc. He covers passive investment strategies.

Before joining Morningstar in 2016, McCullough was a growth equity analyst with FCI Advisors and served on the firm's manager research committee. Prior to FCI, he worked with the Chief Investment Officer at Tower Wealth Managers on two macro-driven investment strategies and a covered-call strategy. Both firms are Registered Investment Advisors in Kansas City, Missouri. McCullough began his career with Ernst & Young’s financial-services office advisory practice, focusing on risk management and derivative valuation.

McCullough holds a bachelor’s degree in finance and accounting from Syracuse University. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation.

Sponsor Center