Many Sustainable Funds Have Sidestepped the Facebook Meltdown
Analyzing ESG risks in a timely manner can pay off for investors.
As Facebook, its users, and regulators all grapple with the firm's data-privacy and content-oversight issues, the bulk of fund investors have gotten caught in the sell-off. Facebook (FB) is the seventh most widely held stock among mutual funds, according to Morningstar data. It is in all of the main U.S. and global equity indexes that are so popular with investors. It is held by all but one of the 20 largest U.S. large-growth funds and by 15 of the 20 largest U.S. large-blend funds. By contrast, less than half of the large-growth and large-blend sustainable funds hold Facebook.
Sustainalytics issued a report in early June assessing how seven tech companies--the so-called FAANG+ stocks--are positioned to handle data-privacy concerns. (These stocks are Facebook, Amazon.com (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), Netflix (NFLX), Alphabet [Google] (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), and Twitter (TWTR).) It singled out Facebook as being the most at-risk because the firm's advertising-based business model is vulnerable to breaches in user privacy, and it has had relatively weak data-management programs in place relative to the likes of Google, Apple, and Microsoft. In addition, as evidence mounts that Facebook's platform was deliberately used by Russians to disseminate disinformation in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the firm faces pressure from stakeholders for better content oversight, transparency, and improved policies on what type of content is permitted and promoted. Some investors, including environmental, social, and governance asset manager Trillium Asset Management, have called for Facebook chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg to step down as board chairman to focus on the chief executive role. Investors have also called for the company to dissolve its dual-class stock structure, which gives a significant majority of voting rights to Zuckerberg.
Sustainable funds available to U.S. investors appear to have considerably less exposure to Facebook than funds overall. Morningstar categorizes Facebook as a large-cap growth stock. Large-growth indexes had been weighting Facebook at between 3% and 4% of assets, depending on the index, as of midyear. Nearly three fourths (73%) of funds in the large-growth Morningstar Category had positions in the stock as of their most-recent publicly available portfolios. But among sustainable large-growth funds available to U.S. investors, more than half (10 of 18) did not own the stock. Of the eight that did, four were underweight.
Facebook is also a top holding in broad market indexes of U.S. stocks. Its midyear weight in the S&P 500 was 2% of assets. Nearly 60% of funds in the large-blend Morningstar Category had positions in Facebook in their most recently released portfolios. Among sustainable large-blend funds, more than half (21 of 38) did not own Facebook. Of the 17 that did, 13 were underweight and the other four were close to market weight. Only two of the 10 largest large-cap sustainable funds hold Facebook.
Jon Hale does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.