The Morningstar Dictionary: R-Squared
This TMP measure helps gauge the relevance of the benchmark used to calculate Alpha and Beta.
This TMP measure helps gauge the relevance of the benchmark used to calculate Alpha and Beta.
Wendy Stein: R-squared is one of the Modern Portfolio Theory statistics reported by Morningstar. R-squared, along with the other MPT statistics, can help investors assess the risk-return profile of investments. You can find them in the Risk section of a fund or ETF’s Morningstar Report on Morningstar.ca.
R-squared, together with alpha and beta, provide a snapshot of a fund’s returns versus the return of a benchmark index. Without getting into the math, R-squared measures the strength of the relationship between a fund’s performance and a benchmark’s performance, specifically, the degree to which a fund's performance can be explained by the performance of the benchmark.
A higher R-squared value indicates a higher correlation, or relationship, between a fund’s performance and the benchmark’s performance, whereas a lower R-squared value indicates that a fund’s performance hasn’t behaved like the benchmark’s. R-squared is expressed as a percentage and ranges from 0%, or no correlation, to 100%, or perfect correlation, where a fund’s performance has moved in lockstep with the benchmark’s.
R-squared can help to gauge the relevance of the benchmark used to calculate Alpha and Beta, which are relative measures that are only useful when they are calculated using a relevant benchmark.
Let’s take a look at a few examples.
First, the Capital Group Global Equity Fund Series D which has a 3-Year R-squared value of 93.89%. This high R-squared value indicates that the benchmark is comparable, the fund’s returns have a high degree of correlation with the benchmark’s returns and that its Alpha and Beta values are likely to be meaningful and could be used to evaluate the manager’s performance.
The 3-Year R-squared for the BMO Growth Opportunities D fund is low, at 17.95%, which indicates that this fund’s performance bears little relation to the benchmark and its Alpha and Beta values likely shouldn’t be used to evaluate the manager’s performance.
A word of caution though: If a fund's R-squared is very close to 100%, there's a chance it may be hugging its index too closely, and that its returns can be replicated by an inexpensive fund that tracks that benchmark. Of course, index funds have the highest R-squared, as we see with the TD Canadian Bond Index fund which has an R-squared of 99.9%.
Used together, R-squared, Beta and Alpha can help to present a thorough picture of the performance of a fund manager. It’s important to remember though that MPT statistics shine a light on one type of risk, market risk and do not measure a fund’s total risk. It’s also important to remember that they focus on specific, and relatively short, time periods.
For Morningstar, I’m Wendy Stein.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.