Skip to Content
Stock Analyst Update

Bank Stress Test Results Good Not Great

Although all 35 major banks passed, results were on average worse than last year.

The U.S. Federal Reserve released the 2018 results from the supervisory stress tests conducted as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The tests serve to inform regulators, financial markets, and the general public how institutions' capital would withstand a hypothetical set of adverse economic conditions. All 35 of the banks subject to the stress test performed adequately on the most commonly watched measure, the common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, although we note that results were on average worse than last year. State Street, Goldman Sachs, and Capital One all had their stressed common equity Tier 1 ratios fall below 6%, whereas the lowest performer last year went only to 6.5%. Even so, all were still above the 4.5% regulatory minimum. All six of the new foreign banks, which were added to testing this year, passed the regulatory minimums as well, although the real test for them will be the qualitative testing of Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review, or CCAR. These results are satisfactory, and it is not surprising that all have passed, given that banks have been adding common equity capital--over $800 billion since 2009--to strengthen their balance sheets. However, given the tougher hits to banks' common equity Tier 1 ratios, it may prevent a bonanza of capital returns to shareholders this year, although we should note that many banks were already paying out over 30% of earnings in dividends, and close to or over 100% when factoring in share buybacks. Therefore we expect stability for capital returns overall, with the most room for increases within the 18 banks that had stressed results that were no worse than 1-percentage point of last year's stressed common equity Tier 1 results. We expect potentially some more conservatism for those hit hardest this year. We are currently maintaining our fair value estimates and economic moat ratings for the banks.

Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.