Before Passive Was Cool
U.K. advisor Alex Riley saw where the world was going and adopted low fees early on.
Low-cost passive investing has grown in popularity in the United Kingdom since the Retail Distribution Review in 2013 banned financial advisors from accepting commissions from fund companies. But Alex Riley was on board the indexing bandwagon years before then.
Riley, director at Bunker Riley Financial Planning in London, says he saw the move against commissions coming and first dabbled in charging some clients direct fees in 2006. This gave him the ability to use inexpensive passive funds. While these fees were only a small part of the firm’s revenues, it put him well ahead of the curve in the U.K. “The writing was on the wall for many years [before 2013],” he says.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.