Skip to Content
Stock Analyst Update

The Latest CBS-Viacom Drama

CBS reportedly bids under market value for Viacom, and the deal may hinge on management team compensation.


The Redstone-fueled drama at  CBS (CBS) and Viacom continues as insiders on both sides leak rumors about the potential reunion of the two firms. The first set of rumors came out over the holiday weekend from Bloomberg that reported CBS would soon make an initial bid for Viacom. According to multiple media reports, the bid from the CBS special committee was supposedly made on Tuesday in the form of an all stock offer that valued Viacom below its current market valuation of $12.4 billion. The bid also tabs CBS CEO Les Moonves to lead the combined firms with CBS COO Joe Ianniello retaining his number two position.

We expect the independent board at Viacom to reject the initial offer since we think that the board and management (along with the Redstone family, the controlling shareholder) believe that the firm is on the path to recovery and the current share price still undervalues the firm’s long-term potential. While we think a deal is slightly more likely than not to occur due to the insistence of Shari Redstone, we believe that CBS is unlikely to pay a large premium and that Moonves might leave if he is not given the right to select his own team. As a result, the Redstone family may decide to give management more time to turn around Viacom thus increasing its share price and possibly earning a premium in a future deal. We are maintaining our narrow moat ratings for both firms along with our fair value estimates of $71 for CBS and $35 for Viacom.

Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.

Neil Macker does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.