Energy Investors Should Be Cautious Amid Supply Questions
We see room for oil prices to fall, but think some shale producers still look attractive over the long term.
David Meats: By voluntarily curtailing production by 1.8 million barrels a day through March 2018, OPEC and its partners have engineered a supply shortage to drive down inventories. And after a slow start, the strategy seems to be working--U.S. inventories have now fallen 11% since March 2017, and global stocks could reach the five-year range by the end of the year. However, we think the recent ramp in U.S. shale activity will trigger substantial production growth going into next year that could overwhelm oil markets, if the OPEC cuts expire as planned. Therefore, OPEC must decide whether to hand over a portion of its market share to the shale industry or deal with more oversupply.
Further cuts may be rational in the short run. The market responded with a 14% price hike when the cuts were initially announced, outweighing the 5%-6% average volume sacrifice made by participants. However, history suggests that cutting production is not always an effective strategy. For example, Saudi Arabia reduced its output every year from 1981 to 1985 in an attempt to protect crude prices. The rest of OPEC was initially on board as well, but only for a year or two, and the strategy failed miserably. In that period prices fell every year regardless, and the cuts exacerbated revenue losses for Saudi in particular (and adding insult to injury with a significant loss of share). Something similar could theoretically play out anyway in the next few months because the upcoming Aramco IPO gives Saudi an incentive to prop up near term prices. But it isn't clear whether the kingdom is willing to go it alone, and even if its partners agree to participate further they could eventually lose patience with the strategy, and cheat.
Dave Meats does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.