Funds That Go Moatless
Price discipline can offset some of the risks of investing in no-moat firms.
Price discipline can offset some of the risks of investing in no-moat firms.
In a free-market economy, capital seeks the areas of highest return, and whenever a firm develops a profitable product or service, competitive forces are fast to drive down economic profits. Only firms with economic moats--a structural competitive advantage that allows firms to earn long-term above-average returns on capital--are able to fend off competition, the theory goes.
To help investors identify firms with moats, our equity analysts assign one of three Morningstar Economic Moat Ratings: none, narrow, or wide. Some attributes that drive economic moats include network effects, intangible assets, cost advantage, high switching costs, and efficient scale. Firms that do not receive a narrow or wide moat rating do not possess durable competitive advantages, in the view of Morningstar analysts, and hence they may not earn above-average returns over the long term.
While investing in no-moat companies brings risks, price discipline can offset them. Listed below are three value-oriented funds that invest heavily in no-moat companies: All but one have Morningstar Medalist ratings.
Artisan Value (ARTLX) had 35% of its assets in firms rated by Morningstar analysts and with no economic moat as of March 2017. The fund’s veteran managers sometimes lean toward more-cyclical firms when they deem valuations to be compelling. That’s been the case in recent years: The fund, which has a Morningstar Analyst Rating of Bronze, increased its exposure to economically sensitive fare--which tends to lack economic moats--and has bigger stakes in energy and basic materials.
As of June 2017, 30% of the fund’s assets were in energy and basic-materials stocks, and all but two of those 10 holdings had economic moat ratings of none. That bet on energy and basic materials was the main source of outperformance during a stellar showing in 2016 as commodity prices rebounded, but it has been the main drag on performance for the year to date.
Silver-rated Invesco Comstock (ACSTX) had 29% of its assets in firms with economic moat ratings of none as of March 2017. Lead manager Kevin Holt and team look for firms that look cheap on a variety of valuation metrics and generally won’t pay up for higher-quality firms.
Oftentimes, this deep-value approach leads the team to bet on companies and/or sectors that have fallen out of favor. The team increased exposure to energy stocks such as Devon Energy (DVN), Hess (HES), and Suncor Energy (SU)--all of which are no-moat stocks--as oil prices plummeted in late 2014 and throughout 2015. That energy overweighting dragged on results in 2014 and 2015 but was the top contributor to performance in 2016 as oil prices rebounded.
More recently, the fund added no-moat KeyCorp (KEY) in late 2016, believing it was trading at attractive valuation despite investor concerns about its First Niagara acquisition. The fund also picked up generic drug manufacturer Mylan (MYL) in early 2017, believing that concerns over its EpiPen specialty drug were overblown.
Despite lackluster performance over short periods, Holt’s record speaks for itself: Since he joined the fund in August 1999, the fund’s 7.3% annualized gain through June 2017 outpaced the Russell 1000 Value Index’s 6.4% return and the typical large-value peer’s 5.4% return.
Neutral-rated Miller Opportunity (LMOPX) had 32% of its assets in firms with economic moats of none as of March 2017. Lead manager Bill Miller and a small supporting team follow a contrarian, valuation-driven strategy, seeking stocks that they believe have solid, long-term fundamental outlooks but are facing temporary headwinds.
Recently, that approach has led them to healthcare-oriented names such as drugmaker Endo International (ENDP) and IT service provider athenahealth . Miller also owns no-moat homebuilders Lennar (LEN) and PulteGroup (PHM), believing both are trading at compelling valuations with the potential to deliver double-digit earnings growth in upcoming years.
He also favors domestic airlines, as industry consolidation and lower oil prices have improved operating metrics; no-moat Delta Air Lines (DAL), American Airlines Group (AAL), and United Continental (UAL) accounted for more than 12% of assets as of June 2017.
The fund has been a top performer in the bull market that’s reigned for most of the trailing five years through June 2017, outperforming the Russell Midcap Index by an annualized 582 basis points and 98% of its mid-blend peers. But the fund’s elevated risk profile still leaves it prone to substantial declines during market downturns.
Andrew Daniels does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.