Second Quarter in U.S. Stock Funds: Growth on Fire
Growth funds and technology dominated, while value and energy struggled.
Growth funds and technology dominated, while value and energy struggled.
As the second quarter winds to a close, the market still favors U.S. equity funds. Eight of the nine Morningstar Style Box categories have posted solid gains for the quarter to date through June 27, with small value’s slightly negative quarter-to-date category return the outlier.
U.S. growth equity funds have continued to dominate value offerings in 2017, reversing the pattern seen in 2016. Large-growth was the top-performing diversified U.S. equity Morningstar Category for both the quarter and year to date as of late June, with mid- and small-growth not far behind. Strong performance in growth-oriented sectors, including technology, fueled big rewards for many funds, though tech stocks pulled back a bit toward quarter-end.
The energy sector, a value haven and market darling in 2016, changed course in 2017 as oil prices slid during the quarter. Commodity-related stocks, such as precious metals and natural resources, also were losers in this short span. Financials stocks, which had a big tailwind in late 2016 on optimism about the potential for less regulation under the Trump administration, also cooled off.
Winners
Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth (MSEQX), which holds nearly half of its assets in technology stocks, was up almost 11% for the quarter through June 27, landing at the top of the large-growth category--quite different from its 2016 showing, when it posted a loss. Top position Tesla (TSLA) continued its ascent, and about half of its holdings posted double-digit gains for the quarter.
Fidelity OTC (FOCPX) gained 9.4% for the quarter to date, more than doubling its Nasdaq Composite benchmark as the Nasdaq-traded stocks it favors rallied.
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth (TRBCX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Growth (TRLGX) landed in the large-growth category’s top decile, getting an extra boost from out-of-benchmark Chinese Internet names Tencent and Alibaba (BABA).
Fidelity Growth Company (FDGRX) benefited from a huge position in Nvidia (NVDA)--a holding since 2008--as well as a mix of smaller growth plays, including Wayfair (W).
Baron Partners (BPTRX), a mid-growth fund, was up more than 14% for the quarter to date through June 27. Beyond a huge position in Tesla (18% of assets as of March), it also benefited from Zillow Group (ZG) and Panera Bread , which surged after agreeing to a buyout with JAB Holdings during the quarter.
Alger Small Cap Focus (AOFIX) was among the top small-cap finishers for the quarter, buoyed by Metidata Solutions and Universal Display Corp (OLED).
Losers
Among the funds that had a rougher go, Fairholme (FAIRX) lost more than 6% for the quarter to date through June 27, as its Sears-related holdings continued to bleed.
Large-value fund Poplar Forest Partners (IPFPX) cooled off after a strong finish in 2016. A few holdings, including MSC Industrial Direct (MSM) and Mattel (MAT), posted double-digit losses for the quarter.
It’s unsurprising to see deep-value fund Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value (HWMIX) land near the bottom of its category for the quarter. Beyond its value leanings, it also held nearly 20% in energy, a clear headwind for the period.
For all category returns through the previous day, visit the Fund Category Performance page.
More Quarter-End Reports
Market
Stock Market Outlook: Equity Valuations Look Lofty
Economy
Midyear Economic Forecast: Lower Inflation, Slow Growth
Credit Markets
Credit Market Insights: Bond Indexes Perform Well in a Quiet Market
Equity Sectors
Basic Materials Outlook: Propped Up and Too Expensive
Communication Services: AT&T and Verizon--A Duopoly No More
Consumer Cyclical: Amazon Reshapes Retail in Real Time
Consumer Defensive: Retailer Consolidation Sparks Concerns, but Opportunities Exist
Energy: Despite OPEC Cuts, a Crude Awakening Is Near at Hand
Financial Services: Our Take on U.S. Tax Reform and Bank Deregulation
Healthcare Outlook: ACA Repeal Efforts Unlikely to Yield Major Legislative Changes
Industrials: China Shows Signs of Softening, but the Sector Remains Healthy Overall
REITs: Some Scattered Opportunities in a Fairly Valued Sector
Tech: A Tectonic Shift Toward Enterprise Cloud Computing
Utilities: Tough to Stop This Sector's Powerful Performance
Mutual Funds
First Half Winners and Losers for Funds
International-Stock Funds Continue to Prosper
Bonds in the Second Quarter: The Flattening
Portfolio Planning With Christine Benz
Trends and Takeaways From 2017's First Half
PitchBook Reports
Tapping the Brakes on M&A
Katie Rushkewicz Reichart does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.