What Sale Could Mean for Reckitt Benckiser
Disposing of its food business should allow the narrow-moat company to materially enhance its pricing power as a consumer health pure play.
Disposing of its food business should allow the narrow-moat company to materially enhance its pricing power as a consumer health pure play.
On April 3, 2017, Reckitt Benckiser (RBGLY) confirmed media reports that it is carrying out a strategic review of its food business. This is consistent with our thesis that management is building a strong consumer product portfolio, and we would regard a sale of the food segment as a sensible step towards deleveraging from the Mead Johnson acquisition. We maintain our GBX 7,000 fair value estimate for the time being, but we may review our narrow moat rating if the firm disposes of the food business, as we believe Reckitt’s transformation to a consumer health pure play will materially enhance its pricing power.
We estimate Reckitt’s food business, which contains brands such as French’s mustard and Frank’s Red Hot sauces, could be worth between GBP 1.5 billion and GBP 2.0 billion, representing a range of 14-19 times EBITDA. This is a fairly high valuation range within the food industry, but Reckitt’s brands generate EBIT margins in the mid-20% range, well above the industry standard. We think the reported price tag of GBP 2 billion is ambitious and probably only achievable if multiple bidders emerge. The most likely strategic buyer, in our opinion, is Kraft Heinz, which recently made an approach to Unilever. Private equity firms may also be interested. On the other hand, there is a risk that the availability of other food assets may hand some of the negotiating power to the buyers. We expect to hear the outcome of Unilever’s strategic review by the end of this month, and while we don’t expect the company to dispose of its entire food business, a sale of certain food assets--particularly the spreads business--seems a likely outcome. Food lags consumer health and infant formula in pricing power, and we are not surprised to see it being labelled "noncore." Depending on the valuation raised and on management’s determination to deleverage quickly, we also regard the home portfolio as a dispensable asset in Reckitt's transformation into a consumer health pure play.
Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.
Philip Gorham does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.