Stock Market Outlook: A Little Too Buoyant?
The market overall looks slightly overvalued, with basic materials and energy the most overheated, and more value in healthcare and financial services.
The market overall looks slightly overvalued, with basic materials and energy the most overheated, and more value in healthcare and financial services.
Given that corporate earnings have been weak this year, it is somewhat surprising that equity markets have remained so buoyant. Stock prices have recovered from early 2016 fears regarding China's economy and low oil prices as well as June's reaction to the United Kingdom's vote to leave the European Union. Morningstar's director of economic analysis, Bob Johnson, has started to forecast a slowing of the U.S. economy as a result of such factors as weaker auto demand and the end of the Affordable Care Act boost in healthcare spending. Overall, our analysts find our coverage universe to be slightly overvalued.
The financial-services sector became less undervalued during the quarter, in part because our analysts lowered their fair value estimates for several U.K. banks such as Barclays (BCS), Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), Lloyds (LYG), and Banco Santander (SAN). After Brexit in late June, we lowered our assumptions for loan growth and fees while increasing our funding cost assumptions. Although the trade implications of the U.K. leaving the EU will take time to show, companies such as Lloyds have already begun to act by closing branches, laying off employees, and selling property. Our top picks in the financial-services sector are Affiliated Managers Group (AMG), Commerzbank (CBK), and Aegon (AEG).
Three major trends are defining the healthcare sector in 2016. First, the media have given high drug prices increased attention, and both presidential candidates promise to lower drug costs for Americans. Although our healthcare team forecasts that older generic drugs will indeed face increased pricing pressure going forward, innovative drugs should maintain their pricing power for the next several years.
Second, drug companies have halved the time it takes to bring a drug to market compared with a decade ago, thanks to scientific advancements and more-accommodative regulations, particularly in oncology and immunology. These successes augur well for attractive and sustainable economic profits.
Third, low interest rates and a search for growth have encouraged numerous acquisition and merger attempts. Given the environment, investors should be concerned about value destruction through M&A activity. For example, our analysts assessed Pfizer's (PFE) acquisition of Medivation as overvalued (mitigated by the size of the deal relative to Pfizer's enterprise value), and regulators have stopped acquisitions in the drug and managed care industries. Our top picks in healthcare are Allergan where investor concerns about the broad specialty pharma industry are overshadowing the company's innovative pipeline; Roche (RHHBY), whose drug and diagnostics portfolio is being undervalued by the market; and Elekta (EKTA B), which despite company-specific concerns, is still well-positioned in the strong-growth radiotherapy market.
While our energy sector analysts expect oil prices to recover through 2018, they are bearish on oil long term. They expect U.S. shale oil production to start growing again in 2017 despite still-below-peak rig counts thanks to efficiency gains, drilled-but-uncompleted wells being brought on line, and falling decline rates. Our team's long-term oil price assumption is $55 per barrel for West Texas Intermediate, based on the argument that U.S. shale can supply much more crude oil than the world will actually need.
Our basic materials analysts find much of the sector overvalued, given below-consensus long-term expectations for aluminum, copper, iron ore, and steel prices. Industrial metal and steel prices rallied strongly this year as an increase in Chinese fixed-asset investment boosted demand. However, our analysts argue that the credit growth fueling the fixed asset investment is outpacing actual economic growth, and the presumed overinvestment in metals-intensive projects will ultimately lead to disappointing Chinese demand. To illustrate, we expect Chinese steel demand to fall to 653 million metric tons in 2020 compared with consensus expectations for 710 million metric tons of demand in 2020 and the peak of 765 million metric tons reached in 2013.
More Quarter-End Insights
Credit Market Insights: Leaving Brexit Behind
Basic Materials: China-Dependent Producers Largely Overvalued
Consumer Cyclical: Poised to Perform in the Second Half
Consumer Defensive: A Handful of Values in an Overheated Sector
Energy: Rally in the Works, but It Won't Last Long
Financial Services: Berkshire Is Bigger Than Buffett
Healthcare: We See Value in the Drug and Biotech Industries
Industrials: Weak Commodity Prices Weigh
Real Estate: Expect Some Choppy Waters Ahead
Tech & Telecom: Opportunities in Smartphones and IT Services
Utilities: How Long Can the Yield Paradox Survive?
Elizabeth Collins does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.