Agrium Shareholders Favored in Merger With Potash
In this "merger of equals," we would expect to award the combined company a narrow moat, based on cost advantages in potash for both companies and Agrium's solid cost position in nitrogen.
Following reports a couple of weeks ago that Agrium (AGU) and Potash Corp (POT) were considering a merger, the companies announced a "merger of equals" on Monday, potentially creating the world's largest crop nutrient company.
Given our stand-alone company fair values--$20 per share for Potash Corp. and $96 per share for Agrium--the deal terms (52% ownership of the combined company by Potash Corp shareholders) favor Agrium shareholders, in our view. Exclusive of synergies and using the announced share exchange ratio, our Potash Corp. fair value estimate would fall by about 10% and our Agrium fair value would rise by a similar percentage. This is a function of our belief that Potash Corp. is more undervalued than Agrium. Including our estimate of cost synergies, our Potash Corp. fair value estimate remains $20 per share (CAD 26) and our Agrium fair value estimate jumps to $114 per share (CAD 149). We don't think the merger will do much at all to affect fertilizer pricing and our long-term pricing assumptions are unchanged.
We think management's synergy target will prove optimistic. The company hopes to achieve an annual run rate of $500 million in operating synergies two years after the deal closes (expected for mid-2017). Although we think opportunities in selling, general and administrative costs are ripe for cutting, procurement targets, for example, could be harder to achieve. In general, we think it's best to take merger management synergy targets with a grain a salt, given enthusiastic targets are difficult to verify ex-post. We include a run rate of roughly $350 million in annual cost cuts in our model.
We think antitrust regulators will allow the deal to proceed, given fertilizer markets would remain competitive with Agrium controlling less than 3% of global potash capacity. We would expect to award the combined company a narrow moat, based on cost advantages in potash for both Potash Corp. and Agrium, and Agrium's solid cost position in nitrogen.
Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.
Jeffrey Stafford does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.