2 Different Approaches to Selecting Dividend-Payers
American Century Equity Income and Columbia Dividend Income have both provided a smooth ride for yield-seeking investors, says Morningstar's Gretchen Rupp.
American Century Equity Income and Columbia Dividend Income have both provided a smooth ride for yield-seeking investors, says Morningstar's Gretchen Rupp.
Gretchen Rupp: American Century Equity Income and Columbia Dividend Income have both achieved success in their large-cap value investment universe. These actively managed funds are Silver-rated and led by seasoned investment professionals.
Phil Davidson has led Equity Income for more than 20 years whilst Scott Davis has guided Dividend Income since 2001. Both funds hold a similar number of stocks, about 80 to 100, with about 30% of the funds' assets in the respective top 10 holdings. They each require that their holdings pay a dividend and they will also buy other securities including preferred shares and convertible stocks.
Both managers focus on fundamental analysis. While Davis' approach differs slightly in that he is more focused on the predictability of a company's healthy cash flow growth in order to predict dividend payments, Davidson selects from a well-defined pool of about 500 stocks and looks for companies with solid returns on capital, low debt levels, and strong barriers to entry.
Still Davis demonstrates slightly more patience because about half of his portfolio's assets as of February 2016 have been holdings for more than five years. So, while both managers stick to high-quality, well-run companies, Davis' slightly lower turnover ratio has contributed to more attractive aftertax returns.
Generally, over the past decade Columbia Dividend Income has participated in a little more of capturing upside gains when markets rallied, while American Century Equity Income has had a lower down capture ratio, meaning it has held up better during down months than Dividend Income. But both funds' Sortino ratios topped their categories over their respective tenures and they've provided a smooth ride for investors looking for some additional yield.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.