Plunging Currencies Drive a Wedge in Emerging-Markets Bond Funds
Third-quarter sell-off causes a wide dispersion of returns between local- and hard-currency-focused funds.
Third-quarter sell-off causes a wide dispersion of returns between local- and hard-currency-focused funds.
Emerging-markets bonds have recovered a bit so far in October, but the third quarter was a painful reminder of the risks of emerging-markets currency.
The first table below shows recent and long-term returns through September 2015 for JPM EMBI Global Diversified, or JPM EMBI, which tracks hard-currency bonds (those denominated in U.S. dollars). The JPM CEMBI Diversified, or JPM CEMBI, comprises emerging-markets corporate bonds denominated in U.S. dollars, and the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified, or JPM GBI-EM, tracks local-currency-denominated debt.
Indeed, the past few years have been rough for emerging-markets currencies and, thus, local-currency-denominated bonds because of various issues including slowing China growth, the oil and general commodity price slump, political turmoil in certain countries, and the impending Fed rate hike. Meanwhile, the U.S. dollar's continued surge has benefited hard-currency emerging-markets bonds and corporate debt, which is primarily denominated in dollars.
Actively managed emerging-markets bond funds come in four different flavors--hard currency, local currency, corporate, and blended (some combination of the three). Given this, emerging-markets bond funds have seen a wide dispersion of returns this year. The table below reflects the same set of performance numbers for Morningstar Medalist funds that take blended, hard-currency, and local-currency approaches relative to the hard- and/or local-currency benchmarks. (Morningstar does not issue ratings on any emerging-markets corporate-bond funds.)
Local-currency and blended funds were generally the hardest hit in the third quarter, though PIMCO Emerging Local Bond (PELBX) and its index fell by 3 times the amount as Medalist blended funds TCW Emerging Markets Income (TGEIX) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond (PREMX). Hard-currency Medalists fared a bit worse than the aforementioned blended funds during the year on an absolute basis and relative to the hard-currency JPM EMBI. That said, the Medalist funds from all three groups have fared well compared with similarly focused peers over longer time periods, though PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond (PEBIX) has struggled because of some missteps in Brazil and Russia.
Although the risks of local-currency bonds have been clear in recent years, funds that focus on hard-currency-denominated sovereigns and corporates can be hit hard during credit sell-offs. That's because they tend to have heavier exposure to lower-rated countries including Venezuela and Ukraine, which also tend to be less liquid.
The emerging-markets corporate space, which is less liquid overall, is also heavily focused on financials and oil and gas firms, making it more concentrated than developed-markets corporate indexes. Such risks caused the JPM EMBI and JPM CEMBI to slide by more than twice as much as the local-currency-focused JPM GBI-EM in 2008, for example.
Whatever approach is used, investors should use an emerging-markets bond fund strategically rather than as a tactical play to boost yield or total return and be mindful of existing emerging-markets exposure in core or multisector-bond holdings.
For a list of the open-end funds we cover, click here.
For a list of the closed-end funds we cover, click here.
For a list of the exchange-traded funds we cover, click here.
For information on the Morningstar Analyst Ratings, click here.
Karin Anderson does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.