LendingClub: Not the Industry Disruptor You're Looking For
The no-moat online lender's many headwinds make it a dubious investment even after the stock's recent slump.
The no-moat online lender's many headwinds make it a dubious investment even after the stock's recent slump.
Timothy Puls: Peer-to-peer lender LendingClub (LC) is down 50% from its high of $29 in January and 30% since we initiated coverage in June. Despite the fall, the stock is still trading slightly above our $12 fair value estimate, which we consider an unappealing entry point for investors, particularly given the fact that this is a no-moat company, in our view.
While marketplace and peer-to-peer lenders have received a lot of attention of late as potential disruptors to traditional lending, LendingClub faces significant challenges, in our view. The platform does not provide a network effect to fuel growth, nor can it compete with the customer switching costs that banks are able to create with a model that services a client's full financial needs.
Our primary concern relates to the fact that the company's low-cost underwriting and distribution model is entirely replicable. Further, borrower growth isn't guaranteed. Lending is a highly transactional business in which participants must compete primarily on price; but borrowing costs on a personal loan through LendingClub can actually exceed those of alternative options, even compared with credit cards.
LendingClub is expanding beyond just personal loans and into small-business lending, which should continue to fuel growth in the near term; but the company doesn't possess a particular advantage in attracting business borrowers other than those simply turned away by banks. As such, high customer-acquisition costs may prevent the company from generating the necessary margin expansion to justify a higher valuation.
As a peer-to-peer lender, LendingClub must also compete for the necessary capital to fund loans, which is dependent on the investment returns of its loans. This, too, will prove difficult as we believe returns could fall given the declining credit quality of the borrowing base and a general reliance on borrowers that have trouble getting financing elsewhere.
Overall, these headwinds leave LendingClub in a poor position to disrupt the lending market, and investors would be wise to avoid the stock at current levels.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.