2 Funds for Tapping Into GMO's Worldview
Although both funds represent GMO's asset-allocation views well and earn Silver ratings, GMO Benchmark-Free is a pure play on the firm's views, while GMO Global Asset Allocation is more benchmark-conscious.
Although both funds represent GMO's asset-allocation views well and earn Silver ratings, GMO Benchmark-Free is a pure play on the firm's views, while GMO Global Asset Allocation is more benchmark-conscious.
Leo Acheson: Both GMO Benchmark-Free (GBMFX) and GMO Global Asset Allocation (GMWAX) are managed by GMO's asset-allocation team, which is led by Ben Inker. The team is well known for its bold seven-year asset-class forecast, which they derive from their outlooks for current market valuations and profit margins as well as the belief that they will inevitably revert to their long-run averages.
Both funds invest across the globe in equities, fixed income, and alternatives. Once GMO makes its forecasts, it sticks with those views. Their patience, over time, has paid off.
In terms of differences, GMO Benchmark-Free has fewer constraints and is more of a pure play on GMOs asset-class views. The managers aim to earn 5% return above inflation while keeping standard deviation within 5% to 10%. That's about the only constraint the fund has. Meanwhile, GMO Global Asset Allocation implements the team's asset-allocation views in more of a benchmark-conscious way.
The strategy aims to beat a blended benchmark of 65% MSCI All Country World Index and 35% Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index by at least two percentage points annualized, with 3% to 5% tracking error. As a result, the portfolio is not as pure of a representation of GMO's views. So, for instance, GMO currently has a bleak outlook for expected returns from equities.
As a result, at the end of the first quarter of 2015, GMO Benchmark-Free held just 40% of assets in equities, which is at the low end of its typical range, while GMO Global Asset Allocation held 52% in stocks. The difference is that GMO felt compelled to hold a higher equity allocation in Global Asset Allocation to ensure that tracking error relative to the benchmark stays within the targeted range.
Overall, both funds are a solid option and draw upon a well-resourced and proven team at GMO; however, investors who want exposure to GMO's highest-conviction portfolio should stick with GMO Benchmark-Free.
For retail investors looking to access these strategies, Wells Fargo offers Wells Fargo Advantage Absolute Return (WARAX), which earns a Bronze rating, and Wells Fargo Advantage Asset Allocation (EAAFX), which earns a Neutral rating.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.