Financial Services: A Favorable Outlook for Insurance
Diversified insurance and property-casualty are particularly attractive in a sector that looks slightly undervalued overall.
Diversified insurance and property-casualty are particularly attractive in a sector that looks slightly undervalued overall.
While recent price increases have improved profitability in P&C insurance, we don't see a strong reason to assume that pricing will continue to improve. In our view, recent pricing increases have largely been driven by lower interest rates. As lower rates pushed down investment income, higher pricing and underwriting income have been necessary to maintain ROEs. Yields on new issues are still generally lower than yields on maturing securities, and investment income remains pressured. We believe interest rates will continue to have a positive impact on pricing in the very near term, but the effect should fade over time, barring a further decline in rates.
However, we're more optimistic on profitability. Looking at the trends in pricing and profitability, peak levels of profitability have typically lagged peak increases in pricing. In our view, this is due to the time it takes for price increases and improved rate adequacy to filter through insurers' books. We think a momentum factor could also help explain this phenomenon, as momentum in pricing increases would carry pricing past the point justified by fundamental drivers, which would set up the potential for outsize profitability later on. Either way, in the current environment, this trend supports our optimistic view on industry profitability, despite our less optimistic outlook on pricing.
On the investment side, we see surprises as biased to the upside. While interest rates are difficult to predict, with rates near historic lows, we see more upside than downside. Higher interest rates and investment income on the back of recent pricing increases could help propel the industry toward a truly hard state. Also, many insurers have been tactically shortening the duration of their investment portfolio. While this magnifies the current pressure on investment income, it provides greater flexibility to benefit from rising interest rates.
Top Financial Services Sector Picks | |||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Star Rating | Fair Value Estimate | Economic Moat | Fair Value Uncertainty | Consider Buying | |
![]() | |||||
Apollo Global Management | ![]() | $42 | Narrow | High | $25.20 |
![]() | |||||
Berkshire Hathaway | ![]() | $168 | Wide | Medium | $117.60 |
![]() | |||||
WR Berkley | ![]() | $58 | Narrow | Medium | $40.60 |
![]() | |||||
Data as of June 22, 2015 |
Apollo Global Management (APO)
Apollo is a global alternative asset manager with about $160 billion in assets under management deployed across private equity, credit, and real estate strategies. Notably, it manages AUM for Athene, a fixed-annuity provider, which provides Apollo with a $60 billion-plus source of permanent capital. We believe the market is overly focused on the short-term health of the IPO market and the near-term pace of realizations, and is overlooking the strong growth prospects Apollo has in credit, thanks to regulators forcing banks to sell illiquid and risky assets to the firm at a discount.
Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B), (BRK.A)
We continue to be impressed by wide-moat Berkshire Hathaway's ability to generate high-single- to double-digit growth in its book value per share, believing it will take some time before the firm finally succumbs to the impediments created by the sheer size and scale of its operations. We also believe that the ultimate departure of Chairman and CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger will have far less of an impact on the business than many believe it will. In our view, shareholders should be focusing more on excess returns as opposed to outsized returns, as solid operating results, a strong balance sheet, and a low cost of capital combine to make the hurdles lower for the next managers of the firm.
WR Berkley (WRB)
We are optimistic about the direction of profitability in the property and casualty industry. WR Berkley has significant leverage to improved conditions, since its strict underwriting discipline leads to swings in its expense ratio across hard and soft markets. During the last hard market, it averaged a 23% return on equity while earning only an 11% average ROE in the following soft market. With the stock trading at 1.5 times book value excluding goodwill and accumulated other comprehensive income, which is average for commercial P&C insurers, we think the market is underestimating Berkley's ability to improve results.
More Quarter-End Insights
Erin Davis does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.