Moat Upgrades for 8 Banks
We've undertaken a more detailed analysis of the systems in which banks operate and the 'moatiness' of their fee-earning businesses.
We've undertaken a more detailed analysis of the systems in which banks operate and the 'moatiness' of their fee-earning businesses.
Erin Davis: We recently refined our bank-moat methodology to include a more detailed analysis of the banking systems in which banks operate and the "moatiness" of their fee-earning businesses.
As a result, we upgraded the moat ratings of eight banks that we cover: Wells Fargo (WFC) and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in the United States; Svenska Handelsbanken (SVNLY) in Sweden; Toronto-Dominion (TD), Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), and Royal Bank (RY) in Canada; and Banco Santander (SAN) and Banco de Chile (BCH) in Chile. Many of these--including U.S. Bancorp, Toronto-Dominion, and Santander Chile--are trading at attractive discounts to our fair value estimates.
It might be surprising to some investors that our new wide-moat banks include so many non-U.S. banks. That's largely a result of the careful look we've taken at the environment in which banks operate, including macroeconomic, competitive, regulatory, and political factors. We think that some of the less-well-known banking systems, such as that of Chile, are actually more likely to produce sustainable excess returns, because of good regulation and high market concentration, versus the U.S., which features a more competitive marketplace and an overlapping labyrinth of regulation.
It's interesting to note that size doesn't always equal moatiness. Some of the moatier banks we cover, like U.S. Bancorp, are straightforward regional banks. In contrast, we recently downgraded the moat of Deutsche Bank (DB) because none of its many components are moaty enough to outweigh the difficulty of properly managing the bank, and it seems unlikely to produce excess returns in the long run.
We prefer banks that are either fairly simple or that have businesses that share clear synergies--like retail banking and wealth management.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.