Has Quantitative Easing Given Labor Markets a Bump?
Last year, G7 nations that implemented aggressive QE programs saw their unemployment rates drop by more than 1%, while those that didn't saw their rates increase or stay the same.
Last year, G7 nations that implemented aggressive QE programs saw their unemployment rates drop by more than 1%, while those that didn't saw their rates increase or stay the same.
Ronald Czerniawski: In this week's chart, we analyze unemployment trends among G7 nations. The left axis on the chart stands for the unemployment rate as of November, and the bottom axis stands for the change in unemployment rate over the past year. The size of the bubble stands for the number of unemployed workers in each country.
For example, Italy appears to be on the far-top-left side of the graph, indicating that its unemployment rate is not only very high but that it has also increased over the past 12 months. Italy has 3.5 million unemployed workers. France also appears in the unfavorable territory as its unemployment rate remains in double digits.
On the lower-middle part of the graph, Japan and Germany show low unemployment rates, with no change for Germany and a moderate improvement for Japan over the past year.
Finally, on the far-right side of the graph are the economies that implemented aggressive quantitative easing programs--namely, the United States and the U.K. They have seen their unemployment rates drop by more than 1% over the past year.
The eurozone has now announced its own massive QE effort in hopes of achieving similar results. The European Central Bank's motive behind the new stimulus program is to fight deflation and restore price stability. However, the measures should also be able to stimulate the lackluster European labor market.
While Europe's QE is not the cure for all of its underlying structural problems, it should boost European economic activity in the short term.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.