P&G Shares Still Attractive as Management Breaks From the Past
Plans to shed half of its brands should help enhance P&G’s intangible assets and its cost advantages, says Morningstar’s Erin Lash.
Plans to shed half of its brands should help enhance P&G’s intangible assets and its cost advantages, says Morningstar’s Erin Lash.
A 2% fourth-quarter sales increase, a 50-basis-point reduction in the adjusted gross margin to 47.7%, and a 170-basis-point jump in the adjusted operating margin to 17.1% were all an afterthought when compared with the announcement Procter & Gamble (PG) will undergo a strategic initiative to shed 90-100 brands.
This represents more than half of its existing brand portfolio, which in aggregate posted a 3% sales decline and a 16% profit reduction over the past three years. The 70-80 brands it will keep (which include 23 that generate $1 billion-$10 billion in annual sales, as well as another 14 that account for $500 million to $1 billion in sales each year), already account for 90% of the firm’s top line and 95% of its profits. As such, we don’t anticipate a material change to our $89 fair value estimate.
However, we found this announcement striking from a strategic perspective. We think this shows P&G is breaking ties with its former self, looking to become a more nimble and responsive player in the global consumer products arena--a particularly important trait given the stagnant growth emanating from developed markets and the slowing prospects from emerging regions. Even a slimmed-down version of the leading global household and personal care firm will still carry significant clout with retailers, and we think these actions will only enhance P&Gs brand intangible asset and its cost advantage, which in combination form the basis for our wide moat.
Management stressed its decision was based on customer preference rather than along geographic lines. In our opinion, these efforts will quell calls to split up the company (given past challenges to respond in a timely fashion to changing market dynamics) at least over the short term. In addition, we don’t believe this signals any shift in how the company intends to position its products, as management was blunt in stating that some of its products do better (namely Oral B and SK-II with their premium price point) than others.
Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full Procter & Gamble analyst report, including fair value estimates, consider buying/selling prices, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.