Some Chips Investors Shouldn't Cash In
Programmable chipmakers make good long-term tech holdings-ùespecially after their solid quarter.
Programmable chipmakers make good long-term tech holdings-ùespecially after their solid quarter.
One niche in the semiconductor sector worth watching is the programmable-logic industry. Earnings for the big players were very good in the quarter just ended. More important, though, the futures of a number of companies that manufacture these chips continue to show abundant promise.
First Things First: Earnings
Xilinx is currently the trailblazer in programmable logic devices (PLDs). The company's most recent product family is seeing extremely strong demand in the communications industry. What's more, the company's sales and earnings are growing like gangbusters, as demonstrated by fiscal fourth-quarter results, reported Thursday evening. Xilinx reported earnings per share of $0.22 before investment gains, which was a penny higher than expectations. Overall growth was 16% over the December quarter and more than 65% over the same quarter last year.
Earnings from the other two primary players in the PLD industry weren’t exactly shabby, either. Altera reported first-quarter per-share earnings that were $0.02, or 6%, ahead of expectations. Both sales growth and margins were also very good. Sales, for example, grew by 15% over the December quarter and almost 60% over the same quarter last year. The company generated a favorable portion of its sales from its newest products. The firm’s chip supplies are somewhat constrained, but the company should catch up with the strong demand in the communications sector as it increases production of its newer products.
Lattice Semiconductor's (LSCC) earnings in the quarter just ended were also strong. The company reported earnings before goodwill of $0.52 per share, 6% ahead of expectations. Lattice saw strong growth in the quarter, as sales increased by 10% over the fourth quarter of 1999. Management increased its sales-growth target on the year from about 25% to about 30% to 35% in fiscal 2000.
The Nitty-Gritty on PLDs
So what's all the hubbub over programmable-logic chips?
Programmable-logic chips are different than most other semiconductors because the end user can customize them. In a fast-changing industry, such as the data-networking sector, there's an obvious advantage to using a programmable chip. PLDs allow customers to bring their products to market quicker, which is important in gaining a fast lead in a new product area. As PLDs continue to decrease in price and improve in performance, they are becoming more attractive to customers that would have otherwise used a preprogrammed chip. Technological improvements in PLDs are creating more demand for the chips, above and beyond the already-strong growth in the communications industry.
Altera and Xilinx are clearly the industry leaders, with Xilinx holding a slight lead in market share because its product family is an industry juggernaut thus far. Altera isn’t all that far behind, however, and there’s no compelling reason to suggest that either company will significantly pull ahead of the other in the long term. Lattice, on the other hand, would be considered a second-tier player because its chips don't have the same high-growth exposure in the industry.
Expensive, but a Decent Long-Term Bet
Not surprisingly, the valuations of Xilinx, Altera, and Lattice are all fairly steep, given the recent excitement over expected growth in the communications industry. Lattice is the cheapest of the bunch, but justifiably so since it doesn’t have the same growth prospects. Still, the company is the value way to play the industry. Altera trades at a significant discount to Xilinx on the basis of current price/earnings multiples. It's foreseeable that this discount will narrow as Altera's newest family of products hits full stride.
On the whole, the PLD makers are somewhat cheap relative to most other chip companies with similar exposure to the communications sector. Moreover, both Altera and Xilinx are very profitable companies; the margins of PLD makers tend to be higher than the average company in the chip sector. With fabulous earnings-growth potential and the trend of wider use in nontraditional applications, the PLD industry is worth a lot of attention.
Jeremy Lopez does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.