Fairholme Invests in Fannie, Freddie Common Shares
Manager Bruce Berkowitz's new positions in the two government-sponsored enterprises' common shares signal a greater level of conviction in the future of Fannie and Freddie.
Manager Bruce Berkowitz's new positions in the two government-sponsored enterprises' common shares signal a greater level of conviction in the future of Fannie and Freddie.
There were two notable additions to Fairholme's (FAIRX) portfolio as of Nov. 30, 2013. One could have easily missed the fund's new positions in common shares in both Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (FMCC), also known as "Freddie Mac." The two new positions in common shares in the agencies were just 1.1% of the November portfolio, but they signal manager Bruce Berkowitz's increasing confidence in his claim against the U.S. government and his belief that the shares won't be rendered worthless. Recall that Berkowitz is suing the government to restore the rights of preferred and common shareholders following the Treasury department's 2012 decision to send all profits to the government. Berkowitz's endeavor seemed quixotic at first, but last week, the judge on the case allowed Fairholme to continue with discovery.
This all began when Berkowitz built positions in Fannie and Freddie preferred shares last summer. (That combined position grew to 10.7% of the portfolio in November.) The preferreds offered a slightly less risky bet on the companies than the common shares because they're higher in the capital structure. But the bet still looked extremely speculative given the government's stated intention to wind down the companies in the housing crisis aftermath.
Both Fannie and Freddie have recovered along with the housing market and will soon have more than repaid the $188 billion they received in a government bailout. Meanwhile, Berkowitz sent letters to the boards of the two companies last Friday exhorting them to honor their fiduciary duty to shareholders. The ultimate outcome of all this remains highly uncertain, but Berkowitz's argument seems to be gaining some traction.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.