A Conservative Tax-Efficient Portfolio for Retirees
This investment mix is designed to limit risk and keep the tax collector at bay.
This investment mix is designed to limit risk and keep the tax collector at bay.
Note: This article is part of Morningstar's February 2014 Tax Relief Week special report. A version of this article appeared Feb. 28, 2013.
Investors don't get a lot of gimmes, namely simple, low-risk, or no-risk ways to boost their take-home returns. But one of the key ones is managing your portfolio for optimal tax efficiency, thereby (legally) reducing Uncle Sam's cut of your return during the life of your portfolio. Banks and brokerage firms hire armies of lawyers to help wealthy individuals and families limit the taxes they pay on their investments, but they often charge a steep fee for their services. Basic tax-management techniques are a cinch to practice on your own.
Staying attuned to tax efficiency is particularly crucial for those nearing or in retirement. For one thing, most retirees are in drawdown mode, and some strategies for tapping your accounts for income incur fewer tax-related costs than others. Moreover, there's only so much money you can shelter in tax-protected vehicles, so many people come into retirement with substantial shares of their portfolios in taxable accounts. (The higher the level of wealth, the more this is the case.) Finally, retirees and pre-retirees are generally steering ever-larger shares of their portfolios into bonds and cash investments, and income from these asset classes is taxed at a higher rate than is the case for withdrawals from equity accounts.
Proper asset location, which determines the types of investments best-suited for particular accounts, and sequencing withdrawals from your various retirement accounts are key components of tax management for retirees and pre-retirees.
And to the extent that you hold retirement assets in your taxable accounts, it's prudent to concentrate the most tax-efficient investments there while reserving less-tax-friendly investments for your IRA or company retirement plan.
With that in mind, here's an example of what a conservative retiree's taxable portfolio might look like. It's appropriate for very risk-conscious retirees with a time horizon (estimated life expectancy) of 10-15 years. Thus, stability and preserving purchasing power are key goals for this portfolio.
However, individuals with that same time horizon might have higher or lower equity weightings, depending on their specific financial and family situations. Investors should feel free to customize the allocations and individual holdings as they see fit or simply use them as a guide when benchmarking their own portfolios.
A Conservative Tax-Efficient Retirement Portfolio
Holding Allocation % Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation (VTCLX) 20 Vanguard Tax-Managed Small Cap (VTMSX) 5 Vanguard Developed Markets Index 5 Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income (FSTFX) 13 Fidelity Intermediate Muni Income (FLTMX) 50 Vanguard Tax-Exempt Money Market (VMSXX) 7 Total 100
Asset Allocation
As with other model portfolios, I've relied on Morningstar's Lifetime Allocation Indexes to guide the portfolio's asset allocation. However, your own taxable assets may be more or less stock-heavy than the portfolio featured here.
And while the portfolio includes a small cash position, it's there to improve the portfolio's overall risk/reward profile rather than to cover an investor's near-term cash needs. Your own positions in more liquid assets like cash and bonds may well be larger. That's because the conventional wisdom on sequencing in-retirement withdrawals calls for tapping any taxable accounts early on, the better to stretch out the tax-savings benefits of tax-sheltered vehicles.
Fixed-Income Holdings
Municipal bonds and bond funds will make sense for the fixed-income component of many investors' taxable portfolios because income will be free of federal and, in some cases, state tax (provided you stick with bonds issued by municipalities in your state). Use the Tax-Equivalent Yield function on Morningstar's Bond Calculator to determine whether you're better off in taxable bonds or munis once you factor in taxes. If you're in the 25% tax bracket or above, munis will often be better than taxable bonds.
For this portfolio's fixed-income portion, I've relied on actively managed Fidelity municipal-bond funds because they're well-managed and their costs are reasonable. In terms of specific funds, Vanguard's suite of municipal bond funds is also very good and features even lower costs, and therefore would serve as a worthwhile substitute. For the cash component of the portfolio, I'm switching to Vanguard's municipal money market fund; in a low-return world, its rock-bottom costs give it a meaningful edge over other funds, including Fidelity's, which is fairly low-cost itself.
Note that in contrast with my past mutual fund and ETF portfolios, this one does not feature inflation-protected bonds. Yes, inflation protection is important for retiree portfolios, but Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities are a bad bet for taxable portfolios. I-bonds, meanwhile, are more tax-friendly, but investors are limited in their purchase amounts, crimping their appeal for larger investors.
Stock Holdings
Taxable investors have even more choices on the equity side. Building a portfolio composed of individual stocks gives investors the maximum level of control over when they realize capital gains and losses, though many retirees prefer the low maintenance of mutual funds.
On the funds side, traditional index funds, exchange-traded funds, and tax-managed funds all do good jobs of limiting the tax collector's cut of investor returns. Ultimately, I decided to populate the portfolio's equity component with tax-managed funds for U.S.-equity exposure and an index fund for international exposure. Tax-managed funds have exhibited tax-cost ratios that are equal to or lower than those of comparable ETFs or traditional index funds. I also like the fact that tax-managed funds can adjust their strategies to suit the current tax climate, giving them an element of flexibility that traditional ETFs and index funds do not have.
MIC 2014 Ad ModuleTransparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.