For ETFs, Capital Gains Distributions Remain Few and Far Between
As 2013 draws to a close, just a small number of ETFs are expected to make capital gains distributions.
As 2013 draws to a close, just a small number of ETFs are expected to make capital gains distributions.
Tax efficiency is one of the hallmark benefits of exchange-traded funds.
Unlike traditional open-end mutual funds, which redeem shares for cash, requiring funds to sell securities and potentially realize capital gains, most ETFs continually dodge the capital gains tax bullet by redeeming securities in kind. This allows ETF providers to swap out low-cost-basis securities without having to realize as many capital gains.
Now, the redemption process by which ETFs are able to minimize potential capital gains does not always eliminate them entirely. For example, ETFs need a decent amount of trading activity to reduce their securities' cost basis, and not all securities can be easily traded in-kind. As a result, ETFs can and sometimes do have capital gains distributions. And of course, investors still face capital gains taxes when they sell ETFs for a gain. However, capital gains are much less frequent for ETF investors than for mutual fund investors, and some ETFs can go years and years without making a capital gains distribution.
As we approach the end of 2013, major ETF providers again are expecting relatively few funds to make capital gains distributions. Most providers now have issued estimated capital gains distributions, and the results again are impressive.
At five large ETF providers--iShares, Vanguard, State Street, PowerShares, and Schwab--just 38 out of 670 funds are facing capital gains distributions of any kind, whether long-term or short-term. And in almost every case, the distributions are very small--much less than 1% of the affected funds' net asset value.
More Capital Gains Distributions from Bond ETFs
Bond ETFs make up the majority of the affected ETFs that are expected to issue capital gains distributions. There are several critical reasons for this. First, the bond ETF category has seen meaningful outflows this past year, which has required more selling than might otherwise have been the case. Also, equity ETF managers generally have an easier time with lower security turnover in their indexes and hiding capital gains, particularly because the index turnover often happens at the margins. Bond ETF managers, by contrast, in general see higher turnover (because most bond indexes tracked by ETFs do not hold very short-term bonds, the bonds in the ETF must be sold outright eventually).
Breakdown by Firm
The largest ETF provider, iShares, posted stellar results, with capital gains distributions on just four of the firm's roster of 299 ETFs. PowerShares also kept capital gains distributions to a minimum, with distributions on just seven of its 159 ETFs. The numbers were higher at Vanguard, where there were distributions on eight of its 67 ETFs (all eight are bond funds). State Street saw the most capital gains distributions amongst the firms surveyed, with 19 out of its 124 ETFs slated to distribute capital gains. Finally, Schwab pitched a shutout; none of its 21 ETFs issued distributions. At the same time, Schwab is still a relatively small ETF provider, and none of its bond ETFs has more than $500 million in assets. We also assume that its ETF assets are probably a bit stickier, given Schwab's model of focusing on core portfolio building blocks, and their relative lack of liquidity would seem to indicate they are less likely to be heavily used by traders.
Below are tables providing a look at the five largest ETFs with capital gains distributions of any kind, followed by the five ETFs from these providers with the largest capital gains distributions as a percentage of their net asset value as of Dec. 16.
ETFInvestor Newsletter | ||
Want to hear more from our ETF strategists? Subscribe to Morningstar ETFInvestor to find out what they're buying—and selling—in their portfolios. | One-Year Digital Subscription 12 Issues | $189 Premium Members: $179 Easy Checkout |
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.