Icahn’s Big Apple Stake Doesn’t Change Our Thesis
The activist investor’s push for a new round of buybacks could be a good use of capital, but it doesn’t change our fundamental view of the firm’s prospects, says Morningstar’s Brian Colello.
The activist investor’s push for a new round of buybacks could be a good use of capital, but it doesn’t change our fundamental view of the firm’s prospects, says Morningstar’s Brian Colello.
We are maintaining our fair value estimate and moat rating for Apple (AAPL) after the stock received a $15-per-share boost on Tuesday afternoon following the disclosure by investor Carl Icahn that he has a large position in the stock, which the Wall Street Journal believes is roughly $1 billion, and had a recent discussion with Apple CEO Tim Cook about further share repurchases. The news does not change our underlying thesis about Apple, although it clearly added to recent positive momentum around the stock that began with strong June quarterly results and likely continued after reports suggest that new iPhones will be introduced on Sept. 10.
The only fundamental news item, in our view, revolves around Icahn’s discussion with Apple’s management team about further share repurchases. Apple is currently authorized to buy back $60 billion in stock through the end of calendar 2015, and we think the company made a shrewd round of purchases totaling $16 billion in the June quarter as part of this program. In order to fund future purchases and not drain the firm’s U.S. cash balance, Apple will likely need to take on additional debt, since the majority of the firm’s cash is held overseas and is unavailable for dividends or buybacks without paying roughly 35% in additional taxes. Apple’s initial venture into the debt market with the issuance of $17 billion of bonds (which in turn funded the $16 billion buyback in the June quarter) was done at extremely favorable interest rates. With the rise in 10-year Treasury yields to 2.7% since that time, as well as the fact that bond investors already have the ability to own Apple debt today, we anticipate that it will be a bit more costly for Apple to issue a second round of debt to fund further buybacks. Similarly, a new round of buybacks would still be a good use of capital, in our view, but not nearly as attractive as it would have been just a few months earlier when Apple was trading below $400. Other than encouragement to pull the trigger on further buybacks, we tend to think that Icahn’s investment would be one of his more passive ones in terms of owning a cheap stock, rather than an aggressive, corporate raider-type move to shake up the board or split up the company.
Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full Apple Analyst Report, including fair value estimate, consider buying/selling prices, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analysis. Not a Premium member? Get these reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.