How Actively Managed Are Some of the Biggest Large-Blend Funds?
Using the active share metric, we examine the degree to which these funds' portfolios differ from the benchmark.
Using the active share metric, we examine the degree to which these funds' portfolios differ from the benchmark.
We recently took a look at actively managed large-blend funds and in particular the degree to which their performances have correlated with that of the benchmark S&P 500 index. First we looked at funds from this group that historically have shown low levels of correlation with the index and that our analysts like. Then we called out funds that not only showed high levels of correlation with the index but that had the nerve to charge investors above-category-average fees for performance that an index fund might deliver at a fraction of the cost.
To gauge a fund's correlation with the index, we used a metric called R-squared, which measures the degree to which a fund's movements can be explained by the movements of a benchmark. But active share is another method of measuring correlation between a fund and its benchmark.
How to Look at Active Share
Rather than focusing on performance correlations, as R-squared does, active share looks at how different a fund's portfolio is relative to a given benchmark. This includes differences in security selection and/or weightings of the same securities. Active share is expressed on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 representing complete overlap of the two portfolios and 100 representing no overlap at all. So a fund that tracks the S&P 500 index would have an active share rating of 0 compared with the index itself, whereas a fund that holds none of the stocks in the index--such as a small-cap fund--would have an active share rating of 100 compared with the index.
It's important to note that just because a fund has a high active share rating doesn't mean it will outperform one that sticks closer to the benchmark. As Russ Kinnel, Morningstar's director of fund research, discusses in this article, other measures such as expense ratio and Morningstar Rating for funds tend to be more useful in identifying funds that outperform (note that his analysis of active share was limited to U.S. equity funds). However, as a measure of how different a fund's portfolio looks compared with its benchmark, active share is quite useful. So, for example, an investor who uses an S&P 500 index fund as a core holding--but is looking for an actively managed large-cap fund as a complementary holding--might use active share to identify a fund with a portfolio that bears little resemblance to the index.
We decided to look at active share among the biggest actively managed large-blend funds (in terms of total assets) using Morningstar's Direct platform, which is aimed at institutional investors and which provides a fund's active share measurement relative to a benchmark on any given date. The table below lists the 20 largest actively managed large-blend funds from highest active share rating to lowest as of May 22. For comparison's sake, we've also included the fund's active share rating from five years earlier.
The two funds at the top of the list illustrate the fact that differentiating from the benchmark is no guarantee of superior performance. Longleaf Partners (LLPFX), with the highest active share rating both now (96.3) and five years ago (97.4), currently carries a 1-star rating while right behind it in second place is Sequoia (SEQUX) (92.0 now; 97.1 five years ago), a 5-star fund. Many of the funds on the list have become slightly more indexlike in their portfolios compared with five years ago, though in the case of Strategic Advisers Core (FCSAX) this step closer to the benchmark has been far more dramatic. JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus (JLCAX) on the other hand, has become less like the index.
20 Biggest Large-Blend Funds By Total Assets | |||||
Star Rating | Analyst Rating | Assets | Active Share as of 5/22/13 | Active Share as of 5/22/08 | |
Longleaf Partners (LLPFX) | Gold | $8.3 billion | 96.3 | 97.4 | |
Sequoia (SEQUX) | Gold | $6.6 billion | 92.0 | 97.1 | |
FMI Large Cap (FMIHX) | Gold | $7.8 billion | 91.1 | 93.3 | |
Yacktman Focused (YAFFX) | Silver | $9.8 billion | 83.7 | 89.8 | |
Hartford Cap Appreciation (ITHAX) | Bronze | $11.4 billion | 82.1 | 77.2 | |
Franklin Rising Div (FRDPX) | Bronze | $10.7 billion | 81.8 | 89.9 | |
Yacktman (YACKX) | Gold | $11.1 billion | 81.6 | 86.7 | |
Davis NY Venture (NYVTX) | Gold | $20.5 billion | 81.1 | 75.8 | |
JPMorgan US Lg Cp Core Plus (JLCAX) | N/A | $8.2 billion | 80.0 | 63.7 | |
Oakmark (OAKMX) | Gold | $9.6 billion | 74.8 | 83.1 | |
Vanguard Dividend Growth (VDIGX) | Gold | $14.8 billion | 72.1 | 66.5 | |
GMO Quality III (GQETX) | Silver | $14.4 billion | 70.3 | 66.1 | |
Hartford Cap Apprec HLS (HIACX) | N/A | $7.9 billion | 68.8 | 72.6 | |
Am Funds Invmt Co of America (AIVSX) | Silver | $61.9 billion | 65.7 | 55.7 | |
Am Funds Fundmntl Investor (ANCFX) | Gold | $58.0 billion | 64.9 | 65.9 | |
Fidelity Series All-Sect Eq (FSAEX) | N/A | $10.4 billion | 57.3 | 54.9 | |
Fidelity Growth & Income (FGRIX) | Bronze | $6.5 billion | 56.8 | 78.4 | |
Fidelity Dividend Growth (FDGFX) | Silver | $7.9 billion | 53.2 | 69.5 | |
JPMorgan U.S. Equity Instl (JMUEX) | Neutral | $8.1 billion | 51.1 | 48.2 | |
Strategic Advisers Core (FCSAX) | Neutral | $10.5 billion | 32.8 | 64.4 | |
Morningstar Rating data as of May 24. |
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.