Our Favorite International Dividend ETF
High quality and low volatility give this international dividend ETF an edge.
High quality and low volatility give this international dividend ETF an edge.
Investors have many choices when it comes to dividend-focused international-equity exchange-traded funds. PowerShares International Dividend Achievers (PID) is one of our favorites for its quality focus and relatively low volatility. Instead of chasing the highest yield available like many of its competitors do, PID targets durable companies by employing quality screens. This fund is suitable as a small core allocation for investors comfortable with PID’s slight contrarian tilt. This fund can also be used to add to an existing international-equity allocation, as valuations continue to be attractive relative to U.S. equities.
The rationale behind domestic dividend investing applies to foreign equity. Studies show that a strong dividend payout ratio is correlated with higher earnings growth and solid fundamentals. By paying out dividends to investors, managers are forced to use cash responsibly and efficiently instead of going on a buying spree. The opposing view states that holding back cash means managers see opportunities to reinvest in the company to grow future earnings, but the data show that dividend payers outperform nonpaying firms almost all of the time.
PID can be viewed as an international counterpart to popular domestic ETF Vanguard Dividend Appreciation (VIG). PID’s methodology is less stringent, as it requires only five years of increased annual dividends to VIG’s 10, and its quality screens are not as rigorous. Despite methodology differences, PID behaves similarly to VIG. Both funds have yields close to the market average (PID’s is currently 2.59%), which might surprise investors expecting a higher yield. Many of PID’s competitors offer yields north of 4%, but these funds are highly contrarian and invest in firms have been beaten down by the market. PID’s portfolio has more of a mix of value and growth names.
PID weights by dividend yield, which boosts income but also includes some risk: Compared with cap-weighted funds, PID’s weighting scheme adds on additional volatility during rough patches in the market. During such periods, high-yielding companies are the unloved bunch and can trade at a significant discount to their fundamental fair value. Buying a yield-weighted fund is a contrarian stance, but one that has been lucrative. When a historically durable company is high-yielding, it suggests that the market is anticipating bland earnings growth or a dividend cut. Going against the grain has been a profitable decision in past years, as a recent study by Morningstar showed that moderately high-yielding stocks beat low-to-zero yield stock consistently without picking up extra volatility. PID has performed particularly well on this front by not targeting the highest-yielding companies.
All these factors add up to a fund that has offered the best risk-adjusted performance of its peer group. PID has exhibited less volatility than has its competitors since inception and better total return than all but iShares Dow Jones International Select Dividend Index (IDV). PID has also outperformed the MSCI EAFE Index over all time periods since the 2008 financial crisis with less volatility.
Portfolio Construction
PID tracks the International Dividend Achievers Index, which buys ADRs, GDRs, and common stock that have increased their annual dividends for the past five years and have a trading volume of at least USD 500,000 daily. The index is weighted by trailing 12-month dividend yield, except for Canadian stocks, which are weighted by current dividend yield. To qualify, holdings must trade on the NYSE, NASDAQ, or London Stock Exchange. As such, the starting universe of this fund’s index is somewhat narrow, as many foreign companies are listed only on their local exchanges and not in New York or London. The index is reconstituted annually and rebalanced quarterly. Forty percent of the fund is split between Canada and the United Kingdom, with the rest mostly in developed markets, particularly Europe and Asia. Companies listed as ADRs in the United States are included, but not U.S.-domiciled firms. PID is almost entirely allocated to large-cap stocks. The fund is allowed to engage in securities lending but does so on a very minimal scale. PID's sector weightings are well-diversified: heaviest in energy (21%), telecommunications (15%), and health care (14%), with smaller weight given to several other sectors.
Fees
This fund charges 0.56% a year, which is average for foreign large-value exchange-traded funds but slightly expensive for dividend-focused funds. A portion of distributions is withheld for foreign tax purposes from companies in some countries and the dividend yield figure is net of this tax. Investors can file for a foreign tax credit to offset these taxes but not if the fund is held in a tax-advantaged account. Distributions from PID are currently taxed as qualified dividend income.
Alternatives
IDV holds the 100 highest-yielding companies from the developed world, subject to quality and liquidity screens. It is particularly heavy in Australia and light in Japan. It is slightly cheaper than PID at 0.50% a year and is the only fund to beat PID’s total return since 2008.
SPDR S&P International Dividend (DWX) has been particularly popular in 2012, doubling in size to more than $1 billion. Investors have been attracted to its very high yield of just under 7%. DWX is able to provide such high yield because it is a true contrarian’s fund: It weights by yield but without the quality screens used by funds with similar weighting schemes. This means the fund loads up on companies beaten down by the market. Although this fund is cheap at 0.48% a year, it has high portfolio turnover. DWX is over 30% more volatile than PID, and had the worst risk-adjusted performance of the category over the past three years.
WisdomTree DEFA (DWM) weights by dividends paid and keeps North America out of the portfolio. If you’re wary of telecommunications and utilities, this fund might be a good alternative, as it is one of the few dividend payers that doesn’t load up on these sectors. DWM is more volatile than PID but also offers more yield and is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.48% per year.
Another interesting option for international yield is iShares MSCI EAFE Value Index (EFV), which is not a dividend-focused fund but still offers more than 4% yield. This ETF zeros in on value stocks from developed countries and actually out-yields PID because of its larger allocation to unloved Europe. EFV charges 0.40% annually, which is on the cheap side.
ETFInvestor Newsletter | ||
![]() | Want to hear more from our ETF strategists? Subscribe to Morningstar ETFInvestor to find out what they're buying—and selling—in their portfolios. | One-Year Digital Subscription 12 Issues | $189 Premium Members: $179 Easy Checkout |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Abby Woodham does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.