Avon-Coty Combo Could Be Messy
Avon's board may have to reconsider should the offer price climb higher, but a merger could still face several complications.
Avon's board may have to reconsider should the offer price climb higher, but a merger could still face several complications.
We are leaving our $25 fair value estimate for Avon Products unchanged in the wake of the news that the firm has received an unsolicited offer of $23.35 per share in cash (representing a total offer of $10 billion) from privately held beauty company Coty. Avon's board has rejected the offer, believing it substantially undervalues the firm and calling out that it represents a multiple of 1.1 times trailing-12-month revenue and 8.7 times trailing-12-month EBITDA.
While Avon faces a perfect storm of problems at the moment, it's clear that Coty smells blood. The perfume maker, which posted sales of about $4.1 billion for the year ended June 30, 2011, believes a combination would benefit Avon's direct salesforce as the representatives would have Coty's fragrance brands such as Lady Gaga and Calvin Klein to distribute. Any such deal would probably be quite messy, in our view, as Coty has strong department store relationships in the United States. We doubt these retailers would enjoy seeing the same brands that sit at department store counters distributed by direct sales representatives. Additionally, outside the U.S., in markets such as Brazil and Russia, we are not sure how much traction many of Coty's celebrity brands would have. Growth in the fragrance category can be fairly volatile, and while currently it appears to be doing better than it has in some time (based on results we've seen from competitors like Estee Lauder (EL)), it's also suffered significant category contraction in recent years. We're not sure how compelling Avon representatives would find Coty's product offering over the long run.
It's possible that a higher bid will emerge, as this is already Coty's second bid but the first that's been made public. It's also possible that at some point Avon's board may have to reconsider should the offer price climb higher. Coty has said it will not attempt a hostile takeover, but the longer it takes Avon to offer the strategic overhaul that was promised months ago and is long overdue, and the longer it takes the firm to appoint a new CEO, the more Avon will leave itself open to these unwanted assaults. Avon's self-inflicted wounds are having unintended consequences.
Considering that Avon has declined the offer and we think the likelihood is low that Coty's pursuit will succeed, we are leaving our BBB+ issuer credit rating unchanged. If Avon were to accept a higher offer from Coty, we would re-evaluate our rating based on the proposed financing and structure of the transaction.
Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full Avon Analyst Report, including fair value estimate, consider buy/sell prices, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analysis. Not a Premium member? Get these reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.
Lauren DeSanto does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.